Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
The interaction of T2DM and BMI with NASH in recipients of liver transplants: an SRTR database analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Fangshen, Zhang Siyao, Ye Danni, Chen Zheng, Ding Jiawei, Zhang Tao, Ren Shenli, Zhang Yu, Zheng Huilin, Zhou Jie, Hu Zhenhua
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: NASH-related liver transplants are increasing because of the obesity epidemic, but the influence of T2DM on various levels of BMI among NASH recipients is unclear.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed data retrieved from SRTR on 4,515 patients. We divided patients by BMI into five groups: normal weight; overweight; class 1 obesity; class 2 obesity; and class 3 obesity. Statistical analysis was done.
RESULTS: Patients in the NASH group with T2DM had a lower patient and graft survival than patients without T2DM (5-year patient and graft survival: 77.5% vs. 79.8%; P = 0.001 and 76.4% vs. 78.2%; P = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional regression showed an independent association between T2DM and decreased patient and graft survival (HR, 1.170; P = 0.015 and HR, 1.133; P = 0.048, respectively). In the lean and the class 3 obesity NASH groups, patients with T2DM had lower patient and graft survival than the patients without T2DM. In the class 3 obesity NASH group, T2DM was independently associated with decreased patient survival (HR, 1.581; P = 0.027).
CONCLUSION: Our research reveals that the focus of the post-transplantation treatment should be different for different BMI patients.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed data retrieved from SRTR on 4,515 patients. We divided patients by BMI into five groups: normal weight; overweight; class 1 obesity; class 2 obesity; and class 3 obesity. Statistical analysis was done.
RESULTS: Patients in the NASH group with T2DM had a lower patient and graft survival than patients without T2DM (5-year patient and graft survival: 77.5% vs. 79.8%; P = 0.001 and 76.4% vs. 78.2%; P = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional regression showed an independent association between T2DM and decreased patient and graft survival (HR, 1.170; P = 0.015 and HR, 1.133; P = 0.048, respectively). In the lean and the class 3 obesity NASH groups, patients with T2DM had lower patient and graft survival than the patients without T2DM. In the class 3 obesity NASH group, T2DM was independently associated with decreased patient survival (HR, 1.581; P = 0.027).
CONCLUSION: Our research reveals that the focus of the post-transplantation treatment should be different for different BMI patients.