Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
Psychodynamic Insights into Treatment-Resistant Pharmacotherapy: A Case Study Exploring Patient-Physician Dynamics and Adherence to Evidence-Based Practices.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baur Alexander, Kryzanowski Leslie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pharmacological resistance in severe recurrent mood and anxiety disorders remains a significant challenge in modern biological psychiatry. This case report investigates the intricate decision-making process employed by physicians when managing patients resistant to conventional pharmacotherapy.
METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from the patient. Following this, the case report was developed using the CARE checklist (2013) to ensure a comprehensive and systematic documentation of the treatment process and outcomes.
RESULTS: The patient's treatment history highlights the complex nature of pharmacological resistance and the impact of minor medication adjustments versus established clinical practices. A crucial aspect of this case was the patient-physician relationship, particularly addressing the patient's past grievances towards physicians, which played a significant role in the treatment process. Despite efforts to improve the physician's confidence and approach, challenges such as lack of continuity and a fragile therapeutic relationship contributed to treatment failure.
CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the importance of psychodynamic models in overcoming pharmacologic challenges. A deeper understanding of the patient-physician dynamics and addressing underlying emotional factors can enhance treatment efficacy and patient outcomes, providing valuable lessons for managing complex cases of treatment resistance.
METHODS: Informed consent was obtained from the patient. Following this, the case report was developed using the CARE checklist (2013) to ensure a comprehensive and systematic documentation of the treatment process and outcomes.
RESULTS: The patient's treatment history highlights the complex nature of pharmacological resistance and the impact of minor medication adjustments versus established clinical practices. A crucial aspect of this case was the patient-physician relationship, particularly addressing the patient's past grievances towards physicians, which played a significant role in the treatment process. Despite efforts to improve the physician's confidence and approach, challenges such as lack of continuity and a fragile therapeutic relationship contributed to treatment failure.
CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the importance of psychodynamic models in overcoming pharmacologic challenges. A deeper understanding of the patient-physician dynamics and addressing underlying emotional factors can enhance treatment efficacy and patient outcomes, providing valuable lessons for managing complex cases of treatment resistance.