The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2022
The Relationship Between Lateral Nasal Wall Collapse and Nasal Obstruction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bae Mi Rye, Choi Woo Ri, Jang Yong Ju
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: In clinical practice, lateral nasal wall collapse during forced inspiration is widely regarded as a sign of nasal obstruction or criterion indicating nasal valve surgery. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the degree of lateral nasal wall collapse and subjective nasal obstruction. In addition, factors related to lateral nasal wall collapse were also investigated.
METHODS: In this study, lateral nasal wall collapse is determined by the degree of lateral nasal wall triangle (LNWT) area reduction on frontal view during forced inspiration compared to quiet inspiration. LNWT area ratio of the patient and control groups was compared. The relationship between the lateral nasal wall collapse and clinical factors including symptom scores, nasal valve angles, skin thickness were evaluated.
RESULTS: The average LNWT area ratio of the patient (n = 24) and control groups (n = 27) was 0.96 and 0.83 respectively (P = .001). Symptom score (NOSE and VAS) is not related to the degree of lateral nasal wall collapse. Moreover, nasal valve angle and skin thickness were also not related to the degree of lateral nasal wall collapse. In 14 of the 19 patients, the more obstructed side corresponded to the side of narrower nasal valve angle, and 5 were not.
CONCLUSION: Lateral nasal wall collapse is not related to a patients' nasal obstruction.
METHODS: In this study, lateral nasal wall collapse is determined by the degree of lateral nasal wall triangle (LNWT) area reduction on frontal view during forced inspiration compared to quiet inspiration. LNWT area ratio of the patient and control groups was compared. The relationship between the lateral nasal wall collapse and clinical factors including symptom scores, nasal valve angles, skin thickness were evaluated.
RESULTS: The average LNWT area ratio of the patient (n = 24) and control groups (n = 27) was 0.96 and 0.83 respectively (P = .001). Symptom score (NOSE and VAS) is not related to the degree of lateral nasal wall collapse. Moreover, nasal valve angle and skin thickness were also not related to the degree of lateral nasal wall collapse. In 14 of the 19 patients, the more obstructed side corresponded to the side of narrower nasal valve angle, and 5 were not.
CONCLUSION: Lateral nasal wall collapse is not related to a patients' nasal obstruction.