Frontiers in immunology · 2026
A comprehensive analysis of humanized mouse models for the study of cancer immunotherapies.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
De La Rochere Philippe, Loumagne Laure, Rathaux Melanie, Dubois Marine, Denizeau Jordan, Nemati Fariba, Viel Sophie, Rocha Dario, Slavnic Tamara, Thatte Jayant, Li Henry Qixiang, Ouyang Xuesong, Sedlik Christine, Decaudin Didier, Azar Georges, Sidhu Sukhvinder, Piaggio Eliane
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Humanized immune system (HIS) mouse models, generated by engrafting tumors and hematopoietic cells of human (Hu) origin into immunodeficient host mice, effectively recapitulate key aspects of the crosstalk between human immune cells and tumors. These models represent a valuable tool for the preclinical evaluation of immunotherapies.
METHODS: In this study, we provide a comprehensive comparison of two widely used HIS models: the Hu-CD34+ model, which engrafts Hu-hematopoietic cells derived from Hu-CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), and the Hu-PBMC model, which utilizes Hu-peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).
RESULTS: We assess the kinetics, quality and extent of immune cell engraftment, as well as the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Additionally, we investigate the impact of different immunodeficient host mouse strains on immune cell reconstitution in the Hu-CD34+ model. Both HIS models were engrafted with human tumors derived from either cell lines or patient-derived xenografts (PDX), revealing distinct immune-tumor interactions that influenced antitumor responses. Notably, tumor responses to T-cell-directed therapies, including anti-PD1 antibodies, IL-2-anti-IL-2 antibody complexes, and T-cell engagers, varied across these models.
DISCUSSION: Our findings provide novel insights into the properties and limitations of HIS models, offering a critical resource for optimizing next-generation immuno-oncology strategies and guiding the design of future therapeutic interventions.
METHODS: In this study, we provide a comprehensive comparison of two widely used HIS models: the Hu-CD34+ model, which engrafts Hu-hematopoietic cells derived from Hu-CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), and the Hu-PBMC model, which utilizes Hu-peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).
RESULTS: We assess the kinetics, quality and extent of immune cell engraftment, as well as the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Additionally, we investigate the impact of different immunodeficient host mouse strains on immune cell reconstitution in the Hu-CD34+ model. Both HIS models were engrafted with human tumors derived from either cell lines or patient-derived xenografts (PDX), revealing distinct immune-tumor interactions that influenced antitumor responses. Notably, tumor responses to T-cell-directed therapies, including anti-PD1 antibodies, IL-2-anti-IL-2 antibody complexes, and T-cell engagers, varied across these models.
DISCUSSION: Our findings provide novel insights into the properties and limitations of HIS models, offering a critical resource for optimizing next-generation immuno-oncology strategies and guiding the design of future therapeutic interventions.