Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2014
[Comparison of extracorporeal liver assist devices - albumin dialysis versus plasma exchange - in acute-on-chronic liver failure].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kahraman A, Wand K, Eisele L, Witzke O, Canbay A, Gerken G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Extracorporeal liver assist devices are besides causal and symptomatic approaches important therapeutic options in acute-on-chronic (AOC) liver failure. In this retrospective analysis, albumin dialysis was compared to therapeutic plasma exchange (TPA) under various aspects.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 20 patients per group (10 women, 10 men in each group, mean age 51 ± 12,6 years and 48,2 ± 15,2 years, respectively) treated over a period of 3 months were analyzed. During the first treatment, 5 sessions of dialysis were performed (week 1) for both procedures, 3 more sessions were completed in the second and in the third week each. Data were acquired on days 1, 8, 13, 20, 28 and 90.
RESULTS: After 28 days, 13 out of 20 patients following albumin dialysis and 7 out of 20 patients following plasma exchange had survived (p = 0,11). After 90 days, 10 patients following albumin dialysis and 5 patients following plasma exchange were alive (p = 0,19). Degree of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) had not improved significantly. Rates of complication (infections, bleeding or system clotting) were similar under both procedures.
CONCLUSION: Extracorporeal liver assist devices can be considered equally well as a therapeutic option in acute-on-chronic liver failure. Differences in 90-day survival were not observed in our study.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 20 patients per group (10 women, 10 men in each group, mean age 51 ± 12,6 years and 48,2 ± 15,2 years, respectively) treated over a period of 3 months were analyzed. During the first treatment, 5 sessions of dialysis were performed (week 1) for both procedures, 3 more sessions were completed in the second and in the third week each. Data were acquired on days 1, 8, 13, 20, 28 and 90.
RESULTS: After 28 days, 13 out of 20 patients following albumin dialysis and 7 out of 20 patients following plasma exchange had survived (p = 0,11). After 90 days, 10 patients following albumin dialysis and 5 patients following plasma exchange were alive (p = 0,19). Degree of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) had not improved significantly. Rates of complication (infections, bleeding or system clotting) were similar under both procedures.
CONCLUSION: Extracorporeal liver assist devices can be considered equally well as a therapeutic option in acute-on-chronic liver failure. Differences in 90-day survival were not observed in our study.