Enlargement of parapapillary atrophy in follow-up of chronic open-angle glaucoma.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the frequency of an enlargement of parapapillary atrophy in follow-up of eyes with open-angle glaucoma.
METHODS
Prospective observational longitudinal study.
SETTING
Institutional.
PATIENTS: The study included 978 eyes (511 Caucasian subjects) with open-angle glaucoma (n = 548; including 194 eyes with normal-pressure glaucoma), ocular hypertension (n = 289), or without optic nerve disease (n = 141). Highly myopic eyes with a myopic refractive error exceeding -8 diopters were excluded. Mean follow-up was 4.5 +/- 2.4 years (median, 3.8 years; range: 1.5 to 9.8 years).
OBSERVATION PROCEDURES: Optic disk photographs taken annually.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two examiners compared optic disk slides for enlargement of parapapillary atrophy (zone beta) and for signs of progressive disk damage.
RESULTS
An enlargement of parapapillary beta zone was detected in 16 eyes (1.6%) after 3.9 +/- 2.6 (0.6 to 9.1) years of follow-up. It was observed in 15 eyes (2.7%) with open-angle glaucoma, 1 eye (0.3%) with ocular hypertension, and in none of the normal eyes. After excluding eyes with a myopic refractive error exceeding -3 diopters, enlargement of beta zone was significantly more common in eyes with progressive glaucoma (5/81 or 6.2%) than in eyes with nonprogressive glaucoma (3/354 or 0.8%; P <.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Parapapillary atrophy (zone beta) enlarges during follow-up of relatively few eyes with chronic open-angle glaucoma. In the refractive range above -3 diopters, enlargement of beta zone occurs significantly more frequently (P <.001) in progressive glaucoma than in nonprogressive glaucoma. In view of its low frequency, enlargement of beta zone may not be a very useful marker for glaucoma progression.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.