DOI 10.1097/prs.0000000000011231
Outcomes of Flap Reconstruction for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
People with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are at risk of major amputation, which is associated with a high mortality rate (exceeding 50% at 5 years) and reduced quality of life. The authors hypothesized that flap reconstruction of DFUs improves patient outcomes in comparison with standard treatment modalities, including major amputation.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and gray literature were searched on February 9, 2022. Comparative and single-arm studies reporting outcomes of DFUs treated with local, regional, or free flaps that included function, limb loss, mortality rates, and flap failure rates were included. Risk of bias was assessed, and meta-analysis of proportions was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 3878 records were retrieved, of which 45 met the inclusion criteria, including the records of 1681 patients who underwent flap reconstruction of DFUs. Free flaps were most commonly performed ( n = 1257 [72%]). Only one study used a verified functional outcome measure. At 12 months, the mortality rate was 6.35% (95% CI, 3.89% to 10.20%), the limb loss rate was 11.39% (95% CI, 7.02% to 17.96%), and the free flap failure rate was 9.95% (95% CI, 8.19% to 12.05%). All studies were at high risk of bias. A comparative meta-analysis of interventions was not performed because of study method and outcome heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS
There is short-term evidence that flap reconstruction (including microsurgical transfer) has low mortality, limb loss, and flap failure rates. However, there are limited high-quality comparative studies, and uncertainty remains regarding the outcome of DFU flap reconstruction in comparison to other treatments.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.