MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-2002-34350

Медицинская библиотека · Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN · 2002

Re-ventriculostomy for treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus in cases of stoma dysfunction.

Koch D, Grunert P, Filippi R, Hopf N

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In this article, 12 re-ventriculostomies in the treatment for obstructive hydrocephalus are described. The etiology of the hydrocephalus was a benign aqueductal stenosis in 9 patients, a tumor around the aqueduct in 2 patients and intraventricular bleeding in one patient. In all cases the initial ventriculostomy was successful, but after a time interval of 2 weeks to 6 years the patients developed similar clinical symptoms as preoperatively. In all except one case the radiological findings spoke in favour of stoma closure. Intraoperatively the stoma was completely closed in 9 patients and in 3 patients a subtotal closure was observed. In all cases a re-ventriculostomy was performed bluntly with a Fogarty catheter in loco typico at the floor of the third ventricle. Of the 12 patients 6 had an excellent outcome postoperatively, one patient improved and one had a benefit from the re-ventriculostomy although he died of cardiac problems. In the remaining 4 patients the re-ventriculostomy was not successful and the patients needed a shunt operation. In conclusion, after initially successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy, re-ventriculostomy should be considered as a sufficient treatment option in case of suspected stoma dysfunction.

Для цитирования: Koch D, Grunert P, Filippi R, Hopf N. Re-ventriculostomy for treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus in cases of stoma dysfunction.. Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN. 2002. DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-34350.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.