Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024
A Lower IL-34 Expression Is Associated with Non-Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zheng Aitian, Xu Yuanyuan, Cen Nimiao, Wu Biaoliang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The non-healing of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) is a major cause of high disability, morbidity, and mortality. Thus, new therapeutic targets and methods to help healing in patients with DFUs are major research hotspots.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the molecular differences between healing and non-healing DFUs to identify genes associated with DFU healing.
METHODS: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by bioinformatics. Samples were collected from patients with healing (n=10) and non-healing (n=10) DFUs from September 2021 to September 2022. Interleukin (IL)-34 expression was measured by ELISA and qRT-PCT. The fibroblasts from healing and non-healing DFU were divided according to their gene signatures and subdivided based on their gene expression profile differences.
RESULTS: A comparison of fibroblast subpopulation characteristics revealed that the proportion of subpopulation 4 was significantly higher in non-healing DFUs than in healing DFUs. Subpopulation 4 had 254 upregulated genes and 2402 downregulated genes in the non-healing compared with the healing DFUs. The DEGs were involved in several biological functions, including cytokine activity, receptor-ligand activity, signaling receptor activator activity, and receptor regulator activity. IL-34 was downregulated in non-healing compared with healing DFUs, suggesting a possible role of IL-34 in DFU healing. In the clinical specimens, IL-34 was significantly downregulated in non-healing DFUs, consistent with the bioinformatics results.
CONCLUSION: IL-34 expression is downregulated in non-healing DFU. IL-34 appears to be involved in DFU healing, but the exact causal relationship remains to be explored.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the molecular differences between healing and non-healing DFUs to identify genes associated with DFU healing.
METHODS: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by bioinformatics. Samples were collected from patients with healing (n=10) and non-healing (n=10) DFUs from September 2021 to September 2022. Interleukin (IL)-34 expression was measured by ELISA and qRT-PCT. The fibroblasts from healing and non-healing DFU were divided according to their gene signatures and subdivided based on their gene expression profile differences.
RESULTS: A comparison of fibroblast subpopulation characteristics revealed that the proportion of subpopulation 4 was significantly higher in non-healing DFUs than in healing DFUs. Subpopulation 4 had 254 upregulated genes and 2402 downregulated genes in the non-healing compared with the healing DFUs. The DEGs were involved in several biological functions, including cytokine activity, receptor-ligand activity, signaling receptor activator activity, and receptor regulator activity. IL-34 was downregulated in non-healing compared with healing DFUs, suggesting a possible role of IL-34 in DFU healing. In the clinical specimens, IL-34 was significantly downregulated in non-healing DFUs, consistent with the bioinformatics results.
CONCLUSION: IL-34 expression is downregulated in non-healing DFU. IL-34 appears to be involved in DFU healing, but the exact causal relationship remains to be explored.