Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2017
Effects of the rigid gas permeable contact lense use on tear and ocular surface among keratoconus patients.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yuksel Elgin Cansu, Iskeleli Guzin, Aydin Ovgu
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate changes in tear and ocular surface of patients with keratoconus using rigid gas permeable contact lenses (RGPCL) and compare them against keratoconus patients who were not using lenses as well as a control group of healthy subjects.
METHODS: 24 keratoconus patients using RGPCL (Group 1) 22 patients who were not using lenses (Group 3) and 21 healthy subjects (Group 3) were included in the study. Subjective complaints about the subjects' eyes have been investigated using the ocular-surface disease index (OSDI). After the control of best-corrected visual acuity, anterior chamber and fundus examinations were performed.
RESULTS: Schirmer (p-value=0.01) and tear break up mean comparison tests (p-value=0.002) revealed significant differences across different groups but tear osmolarity analysis did not (p-value >0.05). Oxford and OSDI scores were compatible with Schirmer and tear break up test comparisons. (for both p-value=0.001) Moreover, no statistical differences were seen in impression cytology measures between groups. (p-value >0.05) CONCLUSIONS: The erosion in the tear film stability is in line with the erosion in the ocular surface epithelium. Taking into account the statistical indifference between the impression cytology measures across groups, the break up time differences may be attributed to the collagen destruction in tear.
METHODS: 24 keratoconus patients using RGPCL (Group 1) 22 patients who were not using lenses (Group 3) and 21 healthy subjects (Group 3) were included in the study. Subjective complaints about the subjects' eyes have been investigated using the ocular-surface disease index (OSDI). After the control of best-corrected visual acuity, anterior chamber and fundus examinations were performed.
RESULTS: Schirmer (p-value=0.01) and tear break up mean comparison tests (p-value=0.002) revealed significant differences across different groups but tear osmolarity analysis did not (p-value >0.05). Oxford and OSDI scores were compatible with Schirmer and tear break up test comparisons. (for both p-value=0.001) Moreover, no statistical differences were seen in impression cytology measures between groups. (p-value >0.05) CONCLUSIONS: The erosion in the tear film stability is in line with the erosion in the ocular surface epithelium. Taking into account the statistical indifference between the impression cytology measures across groups, the break up time differences may be attributed to the collagen destruction in tear.