MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12669/pjms.333.12241

Медицинская библиотека · Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2017

Comparing the effects of two different contact lenses on corneal re-epithelialization after corneal collagen cross-linking.

Kocluk Yusuf, Cetinkaya Savas, Sukgen Emine Alyamac, Günay Murat, Mete Alper

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether keratoconus (KC) patients who applied the corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) and two different contact lens (CL) showed any differences in complaints and findings following the CXL.

METHODS

This prospective, comparative, double-blind clinical study involved 60 eyes of 60 patients (38 female and 22 male). At the end of the CXL procedure, CL (Balafilcon A) was inserted in 29 patients (Group-1) while CL with different material content (Hioxifilcon A) designed for therapeutic/bandage purposes were inserted in 31 patients (Group-2).

RESULTS

On the 1st and 3th day after the CXL, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of the postoperative symptoms. On the 3th day after the CXL, all cases of both two groups were found to complete the corneal re-epithelialization. There was more PE ratio in the patients who had allergic conjunctivitis.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of Balafilcon A and Hioxifilcon A lens materials, KC patients who underwent the CXL were found to have similar symptoms and clinical findings after the CXL. However, epithelial staining and PE were observed more in KC cases accompanied by allergic conjunctivitis.

Для цитирования: Kocluk Yusuf, Cetinkaya Savas, Sukgen Emine Alyamac, Günay Murat, Mete Alper. Comparing the effects of two different contact lenses on corneal re-epithelialization after corneal collagen cross-linking.. Pakistan journal of medical sciences. 2017. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.333.12241.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.