MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/2017/8145651

Медицинская библиотека · BioMed research international · 2017

Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review.

Kobashi Hidenaga, Rong Shi Song

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of collagen cross-linking (CXL) one year after treatment for keratoconus compared to no treatment by summarizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using a systematic review.

METHODS

Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and the data were extracted by two independent authors. The outcome parameters included maximum keratometry (Kmax), corneal thickness at the thinnest point, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), spherical equivalent (SE) refraction, and cylindrical refraction one year after CXL. We compared the changes in the above parameters with the control group.

RESULTS

We identified five RCTs involving 289 eyes that met the eligibility criteria for this systematic review. The changes in BSCVA from baseline to one year exhibited a significant difference between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for changes in corneal thickness and cylindrical refraction. We did not conduct a meta-analysis in Kmax, UCVA, and SE refraction because their I2 values were greater than 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the systematic review, CXL may be effective in halting the progression of keratoconus for one year under certain conditions, although evidence is limited due to the significant heterogeneity and paucity of RCTs.

Для цитирования: Kobashi Hidenaga, Rong Shi Song. Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus: Systematic Review.. BioMed research international. 2017. DOI: 10.1155/2017/8145651.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.