Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2010
Arterial blood pressure vs intracranial pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eide P K, Park E-H, Madsen J R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the association between arterial blood pressure (ABP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients, and its impact on outcome of shunt surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed all 35 iNPH patients whose ABP and ICP were recorded simultaneously during 6 years (2002-2007). The static and pulsatile pressures were averaged over consecutive 6-s intervals; the moving correlations between ICP and ABP (static and pulsatile) were determined during consecutive 4-min periods to explore time-related variations.
RESULTS: Neither static nor pulsatile ABP were altered in iNPH shunt responders. Elevated pulsatile ICP, but normal static ICP, was seen in responders. The time-varying correlations of static and of pulsatile pressures were generally low, and did not differ between shunt responders/non-responders.
CONCLUSIONS: In iNPH shunt responders, static or pulsatile ABP were not altered and only pulsatile ICP was elevated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed all 35 iNPH patients whose ABP and ICP were recorded simultaneously during 6 years (2002-2007). The static and pulsatile pressures were averaged over consecutive 6-s intervals; the moving correlations between ICP and ABP (static and pulsatile) were determined during consecutive 4-min periods to explore time-related variations.
RESULTS: Neither static nor pulsatile ABP were altered in iNPH shunt responders. Elevated pulsatile ICP, but normal static ICP, was seen in responders. The time-varying correlations of static and of pulsatile pressures were generally low, and did not differ between shunt responders/non-responders.
CONCLUSIONS: In iNPH shunt responders, static or pulsatile ABP were not altered and only pulsatile ICP was elevated.