Revue neurologique · 2009
[Method and results of lumbar infusion test in normal pressure hydrocephalus: review of the literature].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Caire F, Moreau J-J
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The cerebrospinal (CSF) infusion test is used to analyze the dynamics of CSF circulation. We describe the technique and report test results obtained in subjects with normal pressure hydrocephalus.
STATE OF THE ART: The CSF infusion test is based on pressure monitoring during a continuous infusion of saline solution into the CSF space via a lumbar puncture. The main parameters are: intracranial pressure, resistance to CSF outflow (Rout), and compliance of the cranial enclosure estimated by the pressure-volume index. Our review of the recent literature dealing with the results of infusion test in normal pressure hydrocephalus indicates that the positive predictive value is about 80 % for Rout greater than 12 mmHg/ml per minute, i.e. shunt response is observed in 80 % of patients. The information available in the literature for assessing negative predictive value of Rout and usefulness of compliance is limited.
PERSPECTIVES AND CONCLUSION: The CSF infusion test may be helpful for the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus, as supplemental testing when the diagnosis is not certain. We propose a procedure, which includes the infusion test, for identifying shunt-responsive patients.
STATE OF THE ART: The CSF infusion test is based on pressure monitoring during a continuous infusion of saline solution into the CSF space via a lumbar puncture. The main parameters are: intracranial pressure, resistance to CSF outflow (Rout), and compliance of the cranial enclosure estimated by the pressure-volume index. Our review of the recent literature dealing with the results of infusion test in normal pressure hydrocephalus indicates that the positive predictive value is about 80 % for Rout greater than 12 mmHg/ml per minute, i.e. shunt response is observed in 80 % of patients. The information available in the literature for assessing negative predictive value of Rout and usefulness of compliance is limited.
PERSPECTIVES AND CONCLUSION: The CSF infusion test may be helpful for the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus, as supplemental testing when the diagnosis is not certain. We propose a procedure, which includes the infusion test, for identifying shunt-responsive patients.