Expert review of hematology · 2025
Reduced-intensity conditioning for allogeneic transplantation in classical Hodgkin lymphoma.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Narvel Hiba, Ahmed Gulrayz, Hamadani Mehdi
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a curable disease; however, 10-20% of patients experience relapsed/refractory disease. While autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) remains standard, a substantial proportion relapse, necessitating alternative strategies. Allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) remains a potentially curative option and here we emphasize the role of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) in HL.
AREAS COVERED: In this review, we compare the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and RIC allo-HCT in relapsed/refractory HL. Additionally, we describe the evolving landscape of transplantation in HL with the use of novel agents, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, the role of alternative donors especially for ethnic minorities, and the evolving literature on the role of post-transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTC) in improving outcomes.
EXPERT OPINION: Allo-HCT remains a potentially curative option for patients with relapsed/refractory HL. RIC allo-HCT has emerged as the preferred platform for most patients, offering a favorable balance between efficacy and tolerability by leveraging graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) effects while minimizing non-relapse mortality over myeloablative conditioning. The use of ICI in the first line has significantly altered post-transplant outcomes by enhancing GVM effects but also increasing the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). PTCy-based prophylaxis and optimized donor selection now enable the safer use of alternative donors without compromising outcomes.
AREAS COVERED: In this review, we compare the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and RIC allo-HCT in relapsed/refractory HL. Additionally, we describe the evolving landscape of transplantation in HL with the use of novel agents, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, the role of alternative donors especially for ethnic minorities, and the evolving literature on the role of post-transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTC) in improving outcomes.
EXPERT OPINION: Allo-HCT remains a potentially curative option for patients with relapsed/refractory HL. RIC allo-HCT has emerged as the preferred platform for most patients, offering a favorable balance between efficacy and tolerability by leveraging graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) effects while minimizing non-relapse mortality over myeloablative conditioning. The use of ICI in the first line has significantly altered post-transplant outcomes by enhancing GVM effects but also increasing the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). PTCy-based prophylaxis and optimized donor selection now enable the safer use of alternative donors without compromising outcomes.