Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine · 2000
[Clinical implications of a new TSH receptor antibody assay (DYNOtest TRAKhuman) in autoimmune thyroid diseases].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Meller J, Schreivogel I, Bergmann A, Morgenthaler N, Hüfner M, Becker W
Аннотация
AIM: Conventional radioreceptor-antibody-assays (RAAs) fail in the detection of TSH-receptor antibodies (TRAKs) in 10-30% of patients with Graves' disease (GD). The aim of this study was the evaluation of the diagnostic and clinical impact of a new RRA (DYNOtest TRAKhuman) which uses the human recombinant TSH-Receptor in the diagnosis of autoimmune thyroid disease.
METHODS: Sera from 142 consecutive patients (GD: n = 50, autoimmune thyroiditis/AIT: n = 92) and from 55 controls (31 patients without any thyroid disease and 14 with euthyroid goiter) were evaluated both with the DYNOtest TRAKhuman-assay and a conventional RRA (TRAK-Assay). Thyroid in vitro parameters and thyroid sonography were performed in all patients.
RESULTS: The DYNOtest TRAK-assay was significantly superior to the conventional RRA in the diagnosis of GD (p < 0.00012), especially in those who were treated by thionamides (p < 0.003) and in the diagnosis of TRAK-positive patients with AIT (p < 0.003). The majority of TRAK-positive AIT-patients suffered from hypothyroidism. One false positive result in patients with euthyroid goiter was found in the TRAK-Assay as well as in the DYNOtest TRAKhuman-Assay. Therefore the specificity of the DYNOtest TRAKhuman was not inferior compared with the conventional assay.
CONCLUSION: The DYNOtest TRAK-assay is superior in the diagnostic work up of Graves' disease compared with a conventional TRAK-assay and offers an equal specificity.
METHODS: Sera from 142 consecutive patients (GD: n = 50, autoimmune thyroiditis/AIT: n = 92) and from 55 controls (31 patients without any thyroid disease and 14 with euthyroid goiter) were evaluated both with the DYNOtest TRAKhuman-assay and a conventional RRA (TRAK-Assay). Thyroid in vitro parameters and thyroid sonography were performed in all patients.
RESULTS: The DYNOtest TRAK-assay was significantly superior to the conventional RRA in the diagnosis of GD (p < 0.00012), especially in those who were treated by thionamides (p < 0.003) and in the diagnosis of TRAK-positive patients with AIT (p < 0.003). The majority of TRAK-positive AIT-patients suffered from hypothyroidism. One false positive result in patients with euthyroid goiter was found in the TRAK-Assay as well as in the DYNOtest TRAKhuman-Assay. Therefore the specificity of the DYNOtest TRAKhuman was not inferior compared with the conventional assay.
CONCLUSION: The DYNOtest TRAK-assay is superior in the diagnostic work up of Graves' disease compared with a conventional TRAK-assay and offers an equal specificity.