ANZ journal of surgery · 2012
Effect of handover on the outcomes of small bowel obstruction in an acute care surgery model.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lien Ivy, Wong Shing W, Malouf Phillip, Truskett Philip G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: An acute care surgery (ACS) model was introduced to manage emergency surgical presentations efficiently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of patient handover in an ACS model on the outcomes of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO).
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients who were admitted with adhesive SBO at Prince of Wales Hospital. The cohort consisted of all patients treated by the ACS team from its introduction in September 2005 to February 2011. Patients in the ACS cohort were divided into two groups: those whose care was handed over to another surgeon and those whose care was not. These groups of patients were compared with a random sample of 50 patients in the pre-ACS period.
RESULTS: In the ACS period, there was no significant difference in complication rates or length of hospital stay in those who were not handed over and those who were. A significantly higher proportion of operations took place during the day for the group who had been handed over (72.7% versus 36.7%; P = 0.005). There were no significant differences in complication rates or length of hospital stay in the pre-ACS and ACS period.
CONCLUSION: Management under an ACS team does not increase adverse outcomes for adhesive SBO. Patients can be safely handed over within an ACS framework. Other members of the ACS team may help facilitate continuity of care.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on patients who were admitted with adhesive SBO at Prince of Wales Hospital. The cohort consisted of all patients treated by the ACS team from its introduction in September 2005 to February 2011. Patients in the ACS cohort were divided into two groups: those whose care was handed over to another surgeon and those whose care was not. These groups of patients were compared with a random sample of 50 patients in the pre-ACS period.
RESULTS: In the ACS period, there was no significant difference in complication rates or length of hospital stay in those who were not handed over and those who were. A significantly higher proportion of operations took place during the day for the group who had been handed over (72.7% versus 36.7%; P = 0.005). There were no significant differences in complication rates or length of hospital stay in the pre-ACS and ACS period.
CONCLUSION: Management under an ACS team does not increase adverse outcomes for adhesive SBO. Patients can be safely handed over within an ACS framework. Other members of the ACS team may help facilitate continuity of care.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaCohort StudiesEmergency TreatmentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntestinal ObstructionIntestine, SmallLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedModels, OrganizationalPatient HandoffPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult