MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.004

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 2005

Management of esophageal perforations: the value of aggressive surgical treatment.

Richardson J David

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The treatment of esophageal perforation remains controversial, particularly in terms of the type of operative therapy. This report analyzed results of an aggressive treatment protocol.

METHODS

Patients with esophageal perforations in a normal esophagus or those with a motor disorder were treated by operative closure. All defects were buttressed or closed by either muscle or pleura. Sternocleidomastoid muscle was used to buttress or primarily close the defects in the neck, and a flap of diaphragm was often used for thoracic perforation. Patients with perforated cancer or severe underlying disease had an esophagectomy.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients had operation: 50 underwent preservation of the esophagus after closure of the perforation and 14 underwent resection. The leak rate was 17%, but all healed. One patient treated with primary closure died (1.5% mortality); only 1 patient required subsequent esophagectomy. Thirteen of 14 patients treated with esophagectomy had an excellent result.

CONCLUSION

The aggressive approach to esophageal perforations with attempt at uniform closure or resection of severe disease produced excellent results with reduced morbidity and low mortality.

Для цитирования: Richardson J David. Management of esophageal perforations: the value of aggressive surgical treatment.. American journal of surgery. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.