Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2017
Colorado Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Algorithm (CO-ROP): a validation study at a tertiary care center.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Jason M, Lin Xihui, He Yu-Guang, Cao Jennifer H
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The Colorado Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening Algorithm (CO-ROP) recommends screening for infants meeting the following criteria for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP): gestational age ≤30 weeks, birth weight of ≤1500 g, and net weight gain of ≤650 g between birth and 4 weeks of age. This study was performed to evaluate the validity of CO-ROP in a tertiary referral county hospital.
METHODS: CO-ROP was used to retrospectively analyze the data from consecutive newborns screened for ROP using national screening guidelines at Parkland Hospital, Dallas, Texas, between April 1, 2009, to August 30, 2013. Sensitivities and specificities for identifying ROP were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 374 infants were included, of whom 29 (7.8%) developed type 1 ROP and 12 (3.2%) developed type 2 ROP. The CO-ROP model would have decreased number of infants screened by 34% compared to current national screening criteria. CO-ROP had sensitivity of 93.1% (95% CI, 77.2-99.1) and 92.7% (95% CI, 61.5-99.8) for identifying type 1 and type 2 ROP, respectively. Of 29 patients who developed type 1 ROP, 2 were not identified using CO-ROP.
CONCLUSIONS: The CO-ROP model significantly reduced total number screened but failed to detect 2 infants with type 1 ROP, suggesting the need for further modification of the algorithm.
METHODS: CO-ROP was used to retrospectively analyze the data from consecutive newborns screened for ROP using national screening guidelines at Parkland Hospital, Dallas, Texas, between April 1, 2009, to August 30, 2013. Sensitivities and specificities for identifying ROP were calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 374 infants were included, of whom 29 (7.8%) developed type 1 ROP and 12 (3.2%) developed type 2 ROP. The CO-ROP model would have decreased number of infants screened by 34% compared to current national screening criteria. CO-ROP had sensitivity of 93.1% (95% CI, 77.2-99.1) and 92.7% (95% CI, 61.5-99.8) for identifying type 1 and type 2 ROP, respectively. Of 29 patients who developed type 1 ROP, 2 were not identified using CO-ROP.
CONCLUSIONS: The CO-ROP model significantly reduced total number screened but failed to detect 2 infants with type 1 ROP, suggesting the need for further modification of the algorithm.