American journal of clinical pathology · 2022
The Effectiveness of Dual-Staining Immunohistochemistry in the Detection of Mantle Cell Lymphoma in the Bone Marrow.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Obiorah Ifeyinwa E, Wang Hao-Wei, Ma David, Martin Eddie, Wilson Wyndham H, Braylan Raul
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a useful method for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) detection in the bone marrow (BM). However, recognition of the neoplastic B cells can be challenging, especially when there is low-level disease.
METHODS: We examined BM from 105 patients with MCL. IHC was performed using cyclin D1/CD79a and PAX5/CD5 dual stains, which were compared with single stains that included CD20, CD79a, cyclin D1, and CD5 and with multiparameter flow cytometry (FC).
RESULTS: Based on the FC data, the overall sensitivity of the dual IHC stains was 95.6%. Both dual IHC stains showed better efficacy for detecting MCL cells compared with the aggregated single stains (P = .012). While three cases were positive by FC analysis but negative for dual staining, four cases showed cells positive for cyclin D1/CD79a and PAX5/CD5 dual staining that were not detected by FC. Two of these latter cases were in patients with minimal or focal disease involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Cyclin D1/CD79a and PAX5/CD5 dual IHC staining is an efficient procedure for the detection of MCL in the marrow and is particularly helpful in low-level or focal involvement by MCL. This approach can be particularly useful when marrow aspirates are inadequate or unavailable.
METHODS: We examined BM from 105 patients with MCL. IHC was performed using cyclin D1/CD79a and PAX5/CD5 dual stains, which were compared with single stains that included CD20, CD79a, cyclin D1, and CD5 and with multiparameter flow cytometry (FC).
RESULTS: Based on the FC data, the overall sensitivity of the dual IHC stains was 95.6%. Both dual IHC stains showed better efficacy for detecting MCL cells compared with the aggregated single stains (P = .012). While three cases were positive by FC analysis but negative for dual staining, four cases showed cells positive for cyclin D1/CD79a and PAX5/CD5 dual staining that were not detected by FC. Two of these latter cases were in patients with minimal or focal disease involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Cyclin D1/CD79a and PAX5/CD5 dual IHC staining is an efficient procedure for the detection of MCL in the marrow and is particularly helpful in low-level or focal involvement by MCL. This approach can be particularly useful when marrow aspirates are inadequate or unavailable.