Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
Imaging of C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4 Expression in 690 Patients with Solid or Hematologic Neoplasms Using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Buck Andreas K, Haug Alexander, Dreher Niklas, Lambertini Alessandro, Higuchi Takahiro, Lapa Constantin, Weich Alexander, Pomper Martin G, Wester Hans-Jürgen, Zehndner Anja, Schirbel Andreas, Samnick Samuel, Hacker Marcus, Pichler Verena, Hahner Stefanie, Fassnacht Martin, Einsele Hermann, Serfling Sebastian E, Werner Rudolf A
Аннотация
In recent years, molecular imaging addressing the C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) has increasingly been used in various clinical settings. Here, we aimed to assess radiopharmaceutical uptake and image contrast to determine the most relevant clinical applications for CXCR4-directed imaging. We also investigated the impact of specific activity on scan contrast. Methods: Patients (n = 690) with a variety of neoplasms underwent a total of 777 PET/CT scans with 68Ga-Pentixafor, serving as the CXCR4-specific radioligand. A semiquantitative target lesion analysis was conducted (providing SUVmax and target-to-blood pool ratio [TBR], defined as SUVmax [from target lesion] divided by SUVmean [from blood pool]). The applied specific activity (in MBq/μg) was compared with semiquantitative assessments. Results: Of the 777 scans, 242 did not show discernible uptake in disease sites, leaving 535 PET scans (68.9%) for further analysis. Very high tracer uptake (SUVmax > 12) was found in multiple myeloma (n = 113), followed by adrenocortical carcinoma (n = 30), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 20), adrenocortical adenoma (n = 6), and small cell lung cancer (n = 12). Providing information on image contrast, comparable results for TBR were recorded, with TBR (>8) in multiple myeloma, mantle cell lymphoma, and acute lymphoblastoid leukemia (n = 6). When comparing specific activity with semiquantitative parameters, no significant correlation was found for SUVmax or TBR (P ≥ 0.612). Conclusion: In this large cohort, 68Ga-Pentixafor demonstrated high image contrast in a variety of neoplasms, particularly for hematologic malignancies, small cell lung cancer, and adrenocortical neoplasms. The present analysis may provide a roadmap for detecting patients who may benefit from CXCR4-targeted therapies.