Surgical endoscopy · 2018
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for the repair of congenital duodenal obstructions in infants and children.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gfroerer Stefan, Theilen Till-Martin, Fiegel Henning Cornelius, Rolle Udo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic repair of congenital duodenal obstruction (LCDO) was described more than 15 years ago. However, studies comparing outcomes of LCDO with open repair (OCDO) are rare. Standardized assessments of complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and the comprehensive complication index (CCI) are not available.
METHODS: All patients undergoing OCDO or LCDO between 2004 and 2017 were identified from the institutional database by retrospective analysis. Postoperative outcomes were assessed, including all complications using the CDC and the CCI.
RESULTS: Forty-seven consecutive patients were identified; 27 patients underwent LCDO and 20 patients had OCDO. Both groups did not differ regarding demographics, associated congenital anomalies, intraoperative pathologic findings, and operative procedures. LCDO was associated with a longer operative time [mean (SD), 202 (89) vs. 112 (41) min, P < 0.0001], shorter time to initiation of feeds [median (range), 1 (0-4) vs. 3 (1-12) days, P = 0.0027], and shorter time to full feeds [mean (SD), 8.2 (4.1) vs. 12.2 (6.4) days, P = 0.0243] compared to OCDO. Shorter length of postoperative hospital stay in LCDO group was achieved for patients without cardiac anomalies [mean (SD), 9.4 (3.1) days in LCDO group vs. 17.2 (9.4) days in OCDO, P = 0.0396] and patients without other anomalies [median (range), 12 (3-38) days in LCDO group vs. 21 (7-31) days in OCDO, P = 0.0460]. LCDO was associated with a lower CCI [median (range) 0 (0-39.7) vs. 4.3 (0-100), P = 0.0270].
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a longer operative time for LCDO, a number of advantages of LCDO over OCDO were recognized comparing both approaches in the repair of congenital duodenal obstruction. Such advantages include a lower morbidity, reduced time to initiation and completion of full enteral feeds, and shorter length of postoperative hospitalization for patients without concomitant cardiac anomalies and for patients without other anomalies when operated laparoscopic. In view of the present results, LCDO, performed in selected patients, appears to represent a viable alternative to OCDO.
METHODS: All patients undergoing OCDO or LCDO between 2004 and 2017 were identified from the institutional database by retrospective analysis. Postoperative outcomes were assessed, including all complications using the CDC and the CCI.
RESULTS: Forty-seven consecutive patients were identified; 27 patients underwent LCDO and 20 patients had OCDO. Both groups did not differ regarding demographics, associated congenital anomalies, intraoperative pathologic findings, and operative procedures. LCDO was associated with a longer operative time [mean (SD), 202 (89) vs. 112 (41) min, P < 0.0001], shorter time to initiation of feeds [median (range), 1 (0-4) vs. 3 (1-12) days, P = 0.0027], and shorter time to full feeds [mean (SD), 8.2 (4.1) vs. 12.2 (6.4) days, P = 0.0243] compared to OCDO. Shorter length of postoperative hospital stay in LCDO group was achieved for patients without cardiac anomalies [mean (SD), 9.4 (3.1) days in LCDO group vs. 17.2 (9.4) days in OCDO, P = 0.0396] and patients without other anomalies [median (range), 12 (3-38) days in LCDO group vs. 21 (7-31) days in OCDO, P = 0.0460]. LCDO was associated with a lower CCI [median (range) 0 (0-39.7) vs. 4.3 (0-100), P = 0.0270].
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a longer operative time for LCDO, a number of advantages of LCDO over OCDO were recognized comparing both approaches in the repair of congenital duodenal obstruction. Such advantages include a lower morbidity, reduced time to initiation and completion of full enteral feeds, and shorter length of postoperative hospitalization for patients without concomitant cardiac anomalies and for patients without other anomalies when operated laparoscopic. In view of the present results, LCDO, performed in selected patients, appears to represent a viable alternative to OCDO.