Kidney research and clinical practice · 2025
Home care program with telemonitoring for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis in South Korea: a cost-utility analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim KyungYi, Kim Tae Hyun, Shin Jaeyong, Jang Suk-Yong, Kim Hyung Woo, Kim Beom Seok, Lee Sang Gyu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of digital health technologies to improve care access and quality of life. The Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare introduced a home care program for end-stage renal disease patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), incorporating educational consultations and remote monitoring. This study evaluates the long-term economic effectiveness of this digital health-based home care program.
METHODS: A Markov model was developed to assess the lifetime cost-effectiveness of the PD home care program. Simulations involved 1,000 patients aged 50 in a PD health state, transitioning annually. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and a cost-utility analysis was performed from a limited societal perspective. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was US$ 32,255 (gross domestic product per capita) per QALY, with a 4.5% discount rate for both QALYs and costs. Outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net monetary benefit, with scenario, sensitivity, and expected value of perfect information (EVPI) analyses addressing uncertainty.
RESULTS: The base case analysis yielded an ICER of $4,895 per QALY, well within the WTP threshold. Sensitivity analysis highlighted PD-associated costs as the most critical parameters. Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 iterations) indicated a 79.0% probability of the home care program being optimal. EVPI analysis suggested an additional $2,963 per patient with perfect parameter information.
CONCLUSION: The PD home care program in Korea appears to be a cost-effective strategy, potentially reducing peritonitis incidence and enhancing healthcare efficiency.
METHODS: A Markov model was developed to assess the lifetime cost-effectiveness of the PD home care program. Simulations involved 1,000 patients aged 50 in a PD health state, transitioning annually. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and a cost-utility analysis was performed from a limited societal perspective. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was US$ 32,255 (gross domestic product per capita) per QALY, with a 4.5% discount rate for both QALYs and costs. Outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net monetary benefit, with scenario, sensitivity, and expected value of perfect information (EVPI) analyses addressing uncertainty.
RESULTS: The base case analysis yielded an ICER of $4,895 per QALY, well within the WTP threshold. Sensitivity analysis highlighted PD-associated costs as the most critical parameters. Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 iterations) indicated a 79.0% probability of the home care program being optimal. EVPI analysis suggested an additional $2,963 per patient with perfect parameter information.
CONCLUSION: The PD home care program in Korea appears to be a cost-effective strategy, potentially reducing peritonitis incidence and enhancing healthcare efficiency.