Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2024
Comparative performance of video-otoscopy and CT in the diagnosis of external ear disease in cats.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gracz Magdalena, Vandenabeele Sophie, Rodrigues Tania N, Duchateau Luc, Saunders Jimmy H, Stock Emmelie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare CT with video-otoscopy for detecting external ear canal masses in cats and to describe CT features of feline external ear disease.
METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the external ear canals of cats that underwent both CT and video-otoscopy. Two blinded observers reviewed the CT scans and their findings were compared with video-otoscopy results evaluated by one blinded observer.
RESULTS: Of the 32 examined ears, 13 had an external ear canal mass detected by both CT and video-otoscopy. No false positives were identified. All 19 ears without masses were correctly identified as true negatives, resulting in perfect agreement for mass detection (kappa = 1.000). On histopathology, 9/13 masses were diagnosed as polyps, 1/13 masses was diagnosed as carcinoma, 2/13 did not undergo histopathology and 1/13 masses seen on video-otoscopy was diagnosed as otitis externa with granulomatous tissue formation. Of the 16 cats examined, 12 had a mass in the external ear canal diagnosed by video-otoscopy: six domestic shorthairs, five Maine Coons and one Oriental Shorthair cat. Of these cats, 11 had a unilateral mass and one had a bilateral mass. There was very low agreement between CT and video-otoscopy for ear canal wall enhancement and erythema (kappa = 0.033), as well as for ear canal thickening and stenosis (weighted kappa = 0.056). There was no significant difference between chronic and non-chronic clinical signs in terms of the presence of ear canal wall mineralisation (P = 0.223).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is high agreement between video-otoscopy and CT in detecting external ear canal masses in cats. However, there is very low agreement between CT and video-otoscopy for ear canal wall enhancement, erythema, thickening and stenosis. The presence of external ear canal mineralisation did not correlate with the chronicity of clinical signs.
METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the external ear canals of cats that underwent both CT and video-otoscopy. Two blinded observers reviewed the CT scans and their findings were compared with video-otoscopy results evaluated by one blinded observer.
RESULTS: Of the 32 examined ears, 13 had an external ear canal mass detected by both CT and video-otoscopy. No false positives were identified. All 19 ears without masses were correctly identified as true negatives, resulting in perfect agreement for mass detection (kappa = 1.000). On histopathology, 9/13 masses were diagnosed as polyps, 1/13 masses was diagnosed as carcinoma, 2/13 did not undergo histopathology and 1/13 masses seen on video-otoscopy was diagnosed as otitis externa with granulomatous tissue formation. Of the 16 cats examined, 12 had a mass in the external ear canal diagnosed by video-otoscopy: six domestic shorthairs, five Maine Coons and one Oriental Shorthair cat. Of these cats, 11 had a unilateral mass and one had a bilateral mass. There was very low agreement between CT and video-otoscopy for ear canal wall enhancement and erythema (kappa = 0.033), as well as for ear canal thickening and stenosis (weighted kappa = 0.056). There was no significant difference between chronic and non-chronic clinical signs in terms of the presence of ear canal wall mineralisation (P = 0.223).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is high agreement between video-otoscopy and CT in detecting external ear canal masses in cats. However, there is very low agreement between CT and video-otoscopy for ear canal wall enhancement, erythema, thickening and stenosis. The presence of external ear canal mineralisation did not correlate with the chronicity of clinical signs.