International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2024
Rejection in the setting of combined Heart and Liver Transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nandkeolyar Shuktika, Gupta Tripti, Brinkley D Marshall, Alexopoulos Sophoclis, Firsich Emily, Fossey Sally Anne, Fowler Rachel, Frischhertz Benjamin, Harrison Kimberly, Lindenfeld JoAnn, Montenovo Martin, Pedrotty Dawn, Punnoose Lynn, Rali Aniket, Shingina Alexandra, Schlendorf Kelly, Siddiqi Hasan, Shah Ashish, Zalawadiya Sandip, Wigger Mark, Menachem Jonathan N
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Each year the number of combined heart-liver transplants (HLT) increases, with two distinct patient populations proceeding down this pathway. The first are patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), most commonly single ventricle patients palliated with Fontan. The second group are those with long standing congestive hepatopathy, amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, or alcohol induced myopathies and liver disease.One argument for HLT has been the low rate of rejection even among sensitized patients, with reported rejection rates ranging from 0% to 31%. Historically, those with CHD have been highly sensitized which in some cases may prevent or at least delay transplantation. As such, a recent consensus statement by Emamaulee et al. suggest that "there may be an immunological benefit to proceed with HLT with significantly fewer acute cellular and humoral rejection episodes". The aim of this study is to demonstrate that HLT patients remain at risk for rejection and have required treatment for it.
RESULTS: There were 15 patients who underwent HLT from January 2017 to February 2022. Of the four patients who did not have CHD, none were considered sensitized, and all underwent induction with basiliximab per our institutional protocol. One of these had rejection. Rejection episodes were identified in four of the 11 CHD patients (36%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study of 15 HLT, including 11 CHD patients (73% denied transplant at ≥ 1 center) demonstrated a higher rate of rejection than previously reported. While theoretically, HLT may mitigate the likelihood of rejection, the risk still exists, and patients benefit from close monitoring commensurate with single organ transplant.
RESULTS: There were 15 patients who underwent HLT from January 2017 to February 2022. Of the four patients who did not have CHD, none were considered sensitized, and all underwent induction with basiliximab per our institutional protocol. One of these had rejection. Rejection episodes were identified in four of the 11 CHD patients (36%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study of 15 HLT, including 11 CHD patients (73% denied transplant at ≥ 1 center) demonstrated a higher rate of rejection than previously reported. While theoretically, HLT may mitigate the likelihood of rejection, the risk still exists, and patients benefit from close monitoring commensurate with single organ transplant.