The American journal of emergency medicine · 2008
A prognostic index for the successful use of adenosine in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in emergency settings: a retrospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xanthos Theodoros, Ekmektzoglou Konstantinos A, Vlachos Ioannis S, Dimitroulis Dimitrios, Tsitsilonis Serafim, Karatzas Theodore, Perrea Despina N
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The use of adenosine on failure of vagal maneuvers in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is recommended. The aim of the present study was to identify a possible prognostic index for the efficacy of adenosine in PSVT.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 321 patients with PSVT, in whom vagal maneuvers failed to restore normal sinus rhythm and who received 6 mg adenosine, followed by 12 mg adenosine (repeated if necessary). A 2-step clustering algorithm was used to reveal nonapparent groupings. Various patients' characteristics were inserted into the model.
RESULTS: A straightforward index has been chosen that would aid the distinction of patients failing to respond to adenosine. The formula, (age / heart rate at admission) + number of past PSVT episodes, was chosen as the one that combined the highest sensitivity (96.2%) and specificity (71.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: This prognostic index constitutes a useful and reliable bedside diagnostic tool to identify patients with PSVT who were less likely to respond to adenosine administration in the emergency setting.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 321 patients with PSVT, in whom vagal maneuvers failed to restore normal sinus rhythm and who received 6 mg adenosine, followed by 12 mg adenosine (repeated if necessary). A 2-step clustering algorithm was used to reveal nonapparent groupings. Various patients' characteristics were inserted into the model.
RESULTS: A straightforward index has been chosen that would aid the distinction of patients failing to respond to adenosine. The formula, (age / heart rate at admission) + number of past PSVT episodes, was chosen as the one that combined the highest sensitivity (96.2%) and specificity (71.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: This prognostic index constitutes a useful and reliable bedside diagnostic tool to identify patients with PSVT who were less likely to respond to adenosine administration in the emergency setting.