Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2007
Influence of reciprocating tachycardia on the development of atrial fibrillation in patients with preexcitation syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kalarus Zbigniew, Lenarczyk Radosław, Kowalski Oskar, Pruszkowska-Skrzep Patrycja, Krupa Hubert, Sredniawa Beata, Sokal Adam, Zielińska Teresa
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the influence of atrio-ventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) on atrial pressures during tachycardia and the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with preexcitation syndrome.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 88 patients (37 females, mean age 37.3 years) with left-sided accessory pathway and AVRT induced during electrophysiologic study. The AF-inducible group consisted of 32 patients with sustained episodes of AF provoked during electrophysiologic study, whereas the noninducible group comprised 56 patients without AF.
RESULTS: We found significantly higher values of maximal and mean left (LAP) and right (RAP) atrial pressures in the AF group compared with noninducible group: LAP max 32.0 versus 20.8, LAP mean 21.6 versus 13.2, RAP max 15.2 versus 11.5, RAP mean 8.2 versus 6.2 respectively (P < 0.001). When analyzing the effect of AVRT on atrial pressures, we found a significant (P < 0.001) negative correlation between anterograde conduction times during tachycardia and LAP max and LAP mean in the whole population, but a significant positive correlation between retrograde conduction time and left atrial pressures. Similar effects of AVRT on the right atrial pressures were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Atrial pressures during AVRT, which depend on the electrophysiological features of tachycardia, play an important role in the genesis of atrial fibrillation in patients with preexcitation syndrome.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 88 patients (37 females, mean age 37.3 years) with left-sided accessory pathway and AVRT induced during electrophysiologic study. The AF-inducible group consisted of 32 patients with sustained episodes of AF provoked during electrophysiologic study, whereas the noninducible group comprised 56 patients without AF.
RESULTS: We found significantly higher values of maximal and mean left (LAP) and right (RAP) atrial pressures in the AF group compared with noninducible group: LAP max 32.0 versus 20.8, LAP mean 21.6 versus 13.2, RAP max 15.2 versus 11.5, RAP mean 8.2 versus 6.2 respectively (P < 0.001). When analyzing the effect of AVRT on atrial pressures, we found a significant (P < 0.001) negative correlation between anterograde conduction times during tachycardia and LAP max and LAP mean in the whole population, but a significant positive correlation between retrograde conduction time and left atrial pressures. Similar effects of AVRT on the right atrial pressures were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Atrial pressures during AVRT, which depend on the electrophysiological features of tachycardia, play an important role in the genesis of atrial fibrillation in patients with preexcitation syndrome.