The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2005
Ferriman Gallwey self-scoring I: performance assessment in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wild Robert A, Vesely Sara, Beebe Laura, Whitsett Thomas, Owen Willis
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine performance characteristics of Ferriman Gallwey self-scoring in women with the polycystic ovary syndrome.
DESIGN: A simultaneous Ferriman Gallwey map scoring design was used.
SETTING: The study was performed at the General Clinical Research Center in a university medical center.
PATIENTS: Twenty-one hirsute patients with the polycystic ovary syndrome were studied.
INTERVENTIONS: Interventions included masked patient, physician, and research nurse simultaneous and independent Ferriman Gallwey map scoring.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were modified Ferriman Gallwey map scores.
RESULTS: Agreement analysis demonstrated that patient self scores, physician scores, and research nurse scores were quite discrepant.
CONCLUSION: The modified Ferriman Gallwey Map scoring system has too much variation to be clinically useful.
DESIGN: A simultaneous Ferriman Gallwey map scoring design was used.
SETTING: The study was performed at the General Clinical Research Center in a university medical center.
PATIENTS: Twenty-one hirsute patients with the polycystic ovary syndrome were studied.
INTERVENTIONS: Interventions included masked patient, physician, and research nurse simultaneous and independent Ferriman Gallwey map scoring.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were modified Ferriman Gallwey map scores.
RESULTS: Agreement analysis demonstrated that patient self scores, physician scores, and research nurse scores were quite discrepant.
CONCLUSION: The modified Ferriman Gallwey Map scoring system has too much variation to be clinically useful.