MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/147641702321136237

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology · 2002

Patient satisfaction study of unwanted facial and body hair: 5 years experience with intense pulsed light.

Lor P, Lennartz B, Ruedlinger R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed in order to evaluate patient satisfaction with epilation using an intense pulsed light source.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2000, 416 patients consulted the authors' practice because of unwanted facial and body hair. A total of 309 patients received treatment with a non-coherent, filtered flashlamp intense pulsed light source. In February 2000, a questionnaire was mailed to each patient and 207 replies were obtained.

RESULTS

Overall, 45 (22%) of patients were very satisfied, 93 (45%) were satisfied and 69 (33%) remained unsatisfied with the outcome of light-assisted hair removal. The non-coherent, filtered flashlamp intense pulsed light source satisfactorily removed unwanted dark hair. Hair-free periods from weeks to years could be observed.

CONCLUSION

Hair removal by a non-coherent, filtered flashlamp intense pulsed light source is an effective and safe method for long-term epilation of unwanted hair. This technique offers a more reliable and practical solution than any other hair removal method, especially for patients with skin irritation and ingrown hair.

Для цитирования: Lor P, Lennartz B, Ruedlinger R. Patient satisfaction study of unwanted facial and body hair: 5 years experience with intense pulsed light.. Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology. 2002. DOI: 10.1080/147641702321136237.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.