Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2018
Accuracy of SS-OCT biometry compared with partial coherence interferometry biometry for combined phacovitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vounotrypidis Efstathios, Haralanova Velina, Muth Daniel R, Wertheimer Christian, Shajari Mehdi, Wolf Armin, Priglinger Siegfried, Mayer Wolfgang J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of a swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometer compared with a standard partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer in terms of phacovitrectomy for vitreomacular pathology and cataract.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany.
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, single center consecutive case series.
METHODS: Patients with age-related cataract, regular corneal astigmatism less than 1.25 diopters (D) and a clinically significant vitreomacular pathology (epiretinal membrane [ERM], macular hole, or vitreomacular traction [VMT] syndrome) who had combined phacovitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling were enrolled. Objective and manifest refraction, corrected distance visual acuity, SS-OCT biometry, and PCI biometry were obtained preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The refractive prediction error and mean absolute error (MAE) were calculated for each biometric device with the Haigis formula. The percentage of eyes with a prediction error within ±0.50 D or less were calculated.
RESULTS: The study comprised 79 eyes of 79 patients. The mean refractive prediction error of all eyes was -0.27 D ± 0.76 (SD) for the PCI biometer and -0.28 ± 0.57 D for the SS-OCT biometer (P = .802), and the MAE was 0.61 ± 0.53 D and 0.46 ± 0.43 D, respectively (P = .012). A prediction error within ±0.50 D or less was observed in 55 eyes (70%) with the SS-OCT biometer compared with 42 eyes (53%) with the PCI biometer (P = .0001). The MAE with the SS-OCT biometer was statistically significantly lower in eyes with ERMs or macular holes compared with the PCI biometer (P = .043 and P = .028, respectively), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in eyes with VMT syndrome (P = .286).
CONCLUSIONS: The SS-OCT biometer showed a statistically significant lower MAE compared with the PCI biometer, and it is recommended for precise intraocular lens power calculations in combined phacovitrectomy for cataract and vitreomacular diseases.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany.
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, single center consecutive case series.
METHODS: Patients with age-related cataract, regular corneal astigmatism less than 1.25 diopters (D) and a clinically significant vitreomacular pathology (epiretinal membrane [ERM], macular hole, or vitreomacular traction [VMT] syndrome) who had combined phacovitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling were enrolled. Objective and manifest refraction, corrected distance visual acuity, SS-OCT biometry, and PCI biometry were obtained preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The refractive prediction error and mean absolute error (MAE) were calculated for each biometric device with the Haigis formula. The percentage of eyes with a prediction error within ±0.50 D or less were calculated.
RESULTS: The study comprised 79 eyes of 79 patients. The mean refractive prediction error of all eyes was -0.27 D ± 0.76 (SD) for the PCI biometer and -0.28 ± 0.57 D for the SS-OCT biometer (P = .802), and the MAE was 0.61 ± 0.53 D and 0.46 ± 0.43 D, respectively (P = .012). A prediction error within ±0.50 D or less was observed in 55 eyes (70%) with the SS-OCT biometer compared with 42 eyes (53%) with the PCI biometer (P = .0001). The MAE with the SS-OCT biometer was statistically significantly lower in eyes with ERMs or macular holes compared with the PCI biometer (P = .043 and P = .028, respectively), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in eyes with VMT syndrome (P = .286).
CONCLUSIONS: The SS-OCT biometer showed a statistically significant lower MAE compared with the PCI biometer, and it is recommended for precise intraocular lens power calculations in combined phacovitrectomy for cataract and vitreomacular diseases.