Acta ophthalmologica · 2018
Validation of Catquest-9SF in Danish: developing a revised form of the Catquest-9SF - the Danish Catquest-7SF.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nielsen Esben, Lundström Mats, Pesudovs Konrad, Hjortdal Jesper
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The primary goal was to validate a Danish translated version of the Catquest-9SF by Rasch analysis. The secondary goal was to investigate whether preoperative Catquest-9SF scores, best-corrected visual acuity, comorbidity, gender, age or corneal astigmatism could predict improvements in subjective outcome.
METHODS: In a prospective trial, 250 patients eligible for cataract surgery were included. Patients filled out the translated Catquest-9SF questionnaire before surgery and again 3 months after surgery. Both preoperative and postoperative questionnaires were included in the Rasch analysis. A multiple reverse stepwise regression model was used to investigate the correlation between preoperative measurements and subjective improvement.
RESULTS: The preliminary Rasch analysis showed misfit of items 4 and 6. These items were removed, and the remaining seven items demonstrated a measurement precision of 2.78, a person reliability coefficient of 0.89, ordered response categories, infit of 0.69-1.22, outfit of 0.73-1.14, observed raw variance explained by measures of 70.4% and an eigenvalue of 1.7. Item 7 showed a mild DIF for gender (0.54 logits), and person mean Rasch score targeting was -1.69 logits. Preoperative Catquest score was the only parameter with a significant correlation to a gain in subjective outcome (p < 0.001). A preoperative Catquest-9SF score of 0.5 carried a 95% likelihood of an increase in subjective outcome.
CONCLUSION: The Danish version of the Catquest-9SF fit the Rasch model. Only preoperative Catquest-9SF score was correlated to subjective improvement, and a cut-off value of 0.5 predicted an improvement in subjective outcome with 95% probability.
METHODS: In a prospective trial, 250 patients eligible for cataract surgery were included. Patients filled out the translated Catquest-9SF questionnaire before surgery and again 3 months after surgery. Both preoperative and postoperative questionnaires were included in the Rasch analysis. A multiple reverse stepwise regression model was used to investigate the correlation between preoperative measurements and subjective improvement.
RESULTS: The preliminary Rasch analysis showed misfit of items 4 and 6. These items were removed, and the remaining seven items demonstrated a measurement precision of 2.78, a person reliability coefficient of 0.89, ordered response categories, infit of 0.69-1.22, outfit of 0.73-1.14, observed raw variance explained by measures of 70.4% and an eigenvalue of 1.7. Item 7 showed a mild DIF for gender (0.54 logits), and person mean Rasch score targeting was -1.69 logits. Preoperative Catquest score was the only parameter with a significant correlation to a gain in subjective outcome (p < 0.001). A preoperative Catquest-9SF score of 0.5 carried a 95% likelihood of an increase in subjective outcome.
CONCLUSION: The Danish version of the Catquest-9SF fit the Rasch model. Only preoperative Catquest-9SF score was correlated to subjective improvement, and a cut-off value of 0.5 predicted an improvement in subjective outcome with 95% probability.