Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2018
Correction of astigmatism with small-incision lenticule extraction: Impact of against-the-rule and with-the-rule astigmatism.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ivarsen Anders, Gyldenkerne Anders, Hjortdal Jesper
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine the influence of against-the-rule (ATR) and with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism on the outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism.
SETTING: University eye clinic, Aarhus, Denmark.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: One eye of each patient had small-incision lenticule extraction for astigmatism of 1.00 diopter (D) or more. Surgery was performed with a Visumax femtosecond laser. Subjective refraction and Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR) were performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Cylinder data were evaluated by vector analysis and correlation analyses. Multiple linear regression was used to predict magnitude of error from age, sex, left or right eye, target-induced astigmatism (TIA), subjective ATR/WTR astigmatism, cap diameter, cap thickness, incision width, and back-surface astigmatism.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 829 patients (505 women; median age 37 years). The mean preoperative subjective cylinder was 1.76 D ± 0.86 (SD). Overall, 66% and 95% of patients achieved a refractive cylinder within ±0.50 D or ±1.00 D, respectively. Astigmatism was WTR in 73% of eyes and ATR astigmatism in 16% of eyes. The linear regression model significantly predicted the magnitude of error (R2 = 0.23, P < .001), with TIA contributing -0.15 D per attempted diopter and subjective ATR astigmatism contributing a constant 0.32 D (both P < .001). No other parameters had a significant impact on the outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Almost 25% of the variation after small-incision lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism might be explained by the size of the attempted cylinder correction and ATR/WTR astigmatism. Incorporating these parameters in preoperative planning might produce more consistent results in high cylinder corrections.
SETTING: University eye clinic, Aarhus, Denmark.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: One eye of each patient had small-incision lenticule extraction for astigmatism of 1.00 diopter (D) or more. Surgery was performed with a Visumax femtosecond laser. Subjective refraction and Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam HR) were performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Cylinder data were evaluated by vector analysis and correlation analyses. Multiple linear regression was used to predict magnitude of error from age, sex, left or right eye, target-induced astigmatism (TIA), subjective ATR/WTR astigmatism, cap diameter, cap thickness, incision width, and back-surface astigmatism.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 829 patients (505 women; median age 37 years). The mean preoperative subjective cylinder was 1.76 D ± 0.86 (SD). Overall, 66% and 95% of patients achieved a refractive cylinder within ±0.50 D or ±1.00 D, respectively. Astigmatism was WTR in 73% of eyes and ATR astigmatism in 16% of eyes. The linear regression model significantly predicted the magnitude of error (R2 = 0.23, P < .001), with TIA contributing -0.15 D per attempted diopter and subjective ATR astigmatism contributing a constant 0.32 D (both P < .001). No other parameters had a significant impact on the outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Almost 25% of the variation after small-incision lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism might be explained by the size of the attempted cylinder correction and ATR/WTR astigmatism. Incorporating these parameters in preoperative planning might produce more consistent results in high cylinder corrections.