Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2017
A clinical study to evaluate the results after toric intraocular lens implantation in cases of corneal astigmatism.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moulick P S, Mohindra V K, Gurunadh V S, Patel Parth, Gupta Sandeep, Khan M A
Аннотация
BACKGROUD: Modern day cataract surgery aims at a spectacle free vision which becomes difficult in cases with pre-operative astigmatism more than 1.5 D. Implantation of toric intra-ocular lenses (IOL) after phacoemulsification in such eyes is one of the ways to counteract this problem.
METHODS: Thirty eyes with pre-operative astigmatism between 1.5 D and 4.5 D were implanted with toric IOLs following uneventful phaco-emulsification. The estimation of the axis of implantation of this toric IOL included calculating the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of the surgeon.
RESULTS: Post-operatively, 20 (66.67%) patients had a visual acuity 6/9 or better and 17 (57%) had a visual acuity of 6/6 at 12 weeks. The mean postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.12 ± 0.15 at 12 weeks. The difference between means of preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) LogMAR and postoperative UCVA at 12 wk LogMAR was found to be statistically significant at p = 0.001. Mean (SD) scores of pre-op astigmatism of study group was -2.20 (0.67) and residual astigmatism was -0.32 (0.44).
CONCLUSIONS: The difference between means of pre-op astigmatism and residual astigmatism in the study group was significant at p = 0.001 with 95% CI -2.22 to -1.50. This significant difference was because of the toric IOL implantation.
METHODS: Thirty eyes with pre-operative astigmatism between 1.5 D and 4.5 D were implanted with toric IOLs following uneventful phaco-emulsification. The estimation of the axis of implantation of this toric IOL included calculating the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of the surgeon.
RESULTS: Post-operatively, 20 (66.67%) patients had a visual acuity 6/9 or better and 17 (57%) had a visual acuity of 6/6 at 12 weeks. The mean postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.12 ± 0.15 at 12 weeks. The difference between means of preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) LogMAR and postoperative UCVA at 12 wk LogMAR was found to be statistically significant at p = 0.001. Mean (SD) scores of pre-op astigmatism of study group was -2.20 (0.67) and residual astigmatism was -0.32 (0.44).
CONCLUSIONS: The difference between means of pre-op astigmatism and residual astigmatism in the study group was significant at p = 0.001 with 95% CI -2.22 to -1.50. This significant difference was because of the toric IOL implantation.