MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.023

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2018

Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction.

Chen Kai-Jung, Joda Akram, Vinciguerra Riccardo, Eliasy Ashkan, Sefat Shervin Mir Mohi, Kook Daniel, Geraghty Brendan, Roberts Cynthia J, Elsheikh Ahmed

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare a biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) algorithm provided by the dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer (Corvis ST) with Goldmann applanation tonometry IOP (Goldmann IOP) and standard dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer IOP measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and refractive lenticule extraction small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgeries.

SETTING

Smile Eye Clinic, Munich, Germany, and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for LASIK and patients scheduled for small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia or myopic astigmatism were included. The preoperative and postoperative evaluations included Goldmann, Scheimpflug tomography, and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer IOP measurements.

RESULTS

The study comprised 14 patients in the LASIK group and 22 patients in the small-incision lenticule extraction group. Preoperative Goldmann IOP and Scheimpflug analyzer IOP values showed significant positive correlation with central corneal thickness (CCT) (P = .05 for LASIK; P = .003 for small-incision lenticule extraction). No significant correlation was found between bIOP and CCT (P > .05). After both surgeries, there were significant decreases in Goldmann IOP (-3.2 mm Hg ± 3.4 [SD] and -3.2 ± 2.1 mm Hg, respectively; both P < .001) and Scheimpflug analyzer IOP (-3.7 ± 2.1 mm Hg and -3.3 ± 2.0 mm Hg, respectively, both P < .001) compared with preoperative readings, whereas bIOP did not differ significantly (0.1 ± 2.1 mm Hg and 0.8 ± 1.8 mm Hg, respectively; P = .80 and P = .273, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The bIOP readings before and after LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction were neither significantly different nor correlated with CCT. In contrast, both Goldmann IOP and Scheimpflug analyzer IOP had significant reductions postoperatively and showed significant correlation with CCT preoperatively.

Для цитирования: Chen Kai-Jung, Joda Akram, Vinciguerra Riccardo, Eliasy Ashkan, Sefat Shervin Mir Mohi, Kook Daniel, Geraghty Brendan, Roberts Cynthia J, Elsheikh Ahmed. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction.. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.