MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/jcla.24624

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022

Misdiagnosis of a patient with congenital dysfibrinogenemia: A case report and literature review.

Chen Xinyan, Yan Jie, Xiang Liqun, Lin Faquan

Клинический случайОбзорСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

We reported a patient with congenital dysfibrinogenemia who was misdiagnosed and reviewed relevant literature, in order to discuss the methods to reduce misdiagnosis.

METHODS

A 23-year-old pregnant woman was found to be with low fibrinogen in antenatal examination at another province teaching hospital, who was misdiagnosed to have hypofibrinogenemia. Fibrinogen infusion or cryoprecipitation was recommended if necessary. The patient came to our hospital for further diagnosis and treatment considering the safety of herself and the fetus. We examined the coagulation function and gene sequencing of the pregnant woman and her family members.

RESULTS

Fibrinogen (Clauss method) was significantly reduced in the patient and her mother, while the level of fibrinogen (PT-derived method) was normal. Thrombin time was prolonged. Heterozygous mutation site was found in exon 2 of the FGA gene, c.104G > A(p.Arg35His).

CONCLUSION

When the fibrinogen (Clauss method) is significantly reduced and the thrombin time is prolonged, PT-derived method and the investigation of family coagulation function should be added, which can be used to diagnose and distinguish congenital dysfibrinogenemia from hypofibrinogenemia.

Для цитирования: Chen Xinyan, Yan Jie, Xiang Liqun, Lin Faquan. Misdiagnosis of a patient with congenital dysfibrinogenemia: A case report and literature review.. Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. 2022. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24624.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.