Transplantation · 2000
Detection of anti-HLA antibody by flow cytometry in patients with a left ventricular assist device is associated with early rejection following heart transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
DeNofrio D, Rho R, Morales F J, Kamoun M, Kearns J, Dorozinsky C, Rosengard B R, Acker M A, Loh E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT) often have elevated levels of panel reactive antibodies (PRA). The clinical significance of anti-human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies detected by flow cytometry in PRA negative patients remains unclear.
METHODS: Eighteen patients who underwent LVAD placement as a successful bridge to HT had standard anti-human globulin complement-dependent cytotoxicity and retrospective flow cytometry assays performed to detect class I anti-HLA antibodies. A positive flow result was defined as a fluorescent ratio of 23:1 versus a negative control.
RESULTS: Six patients had anti-HLA antibodies detected by flow cytometry. Univariate analysis demonstrated more moderate-severe rejection episodes (ISHLT > or = IIIA) at 2 months (0.83+/-0.75 vs. 0; P=0.04) and a trend toward decreased time to first rejection (61+/-17 vs. 225+/-62 days; P=0.06) in these patients. No differences were observed in donor-recipient HLA mismatch or 1 year Kaplan-Meier survival between patients with or without anti-HLA antibodies.
CONCLUSION: Despite a negative PRA, LVAD patients with class I anti-HLA antibodies detected by flow cytometry have a greater incidence of moderate-severe rejection in the first 2 months after HT. Flow cytometry may be a useful clinical tool in screening PRA negative LVAD patients before transplantation. Patients with positive anti-HLA antibody screening by flow cytometry may require more intensive immunosuppression in the early post-HT period.
METHODS: Eighteen patients who underwent LVAD placement as a successful bridge to HT had standard anti-human globulin complement-dependent cytotoxicity and retrospective flow cytometry assays performed to detect class I anti-HLA antibodies. A positive flow result was defined as a fluorescent ratio of 23:1 versus a negative control.
RESULTS: Six patients had anti-HLA antibodies detected by flow cytometry. Univariate analysis demonstrated more moderate-severe rejection episodes (ISHLT > or = IIIA) at 2 months (0.83+/-0.75 vs. 0; P=0.04) and a trend toward decreased time to first rejection (61+/-17 vs. 225+/-62 days; P=0.06) in these patients. No differences were observed in donor-recipient HLA mismatch or 1 year Kaplan-Meier survival between patients with or without anti-HLA antibodies.
CONCLUSION: Despite a negative PRA, LVAD patients with class I anti-HLA antibodies detected by flow cytometry have a greater incidence of moderate-severe rejection in the first 2 months after HT. Flow cytometry may be a useful clinical tool in screening PRA negative LVAD patients before transplantation. Patients with positive anti-HLA antibody screening by flow cytometry may require more intensive immunosuppression in the early post-HT period.