The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2017
Can AMH levels predict the need for increased medication during IVF/ICSI in PCOS women?
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamel Ahmed, Ramadan Wafaa, Hussein Ahmed M, Dahab Sherif, Elsherbini Moutaz M, Lasheen Yossra S, Abu-Hamila Fouad
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the ability of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) to predict the step up of human menopausal gonadotropins (HMG) dose in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles.
METHODS: AMH was drawn before ovulation induction in 976 PCOS women scheduled for IVF/ICSI. After all cycles ended, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to investigate the ability of AMH to predict step up of the HMG.
RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.820 95%CI (0.792-0.848), and a cutoff value of 4.6 ng/ml (sensitivity 74%, specificity 82%) for AMH was taken (p < 0.01). Cases were divided into two groups retrospectively; group (A) (AMH ≤4.6 ng/ml), and group (B) (AMH >4.6 ng/ml). No difference in the mean age (p = 0.147); BMI (p = 0.411), basal FSH (p = 0.221), and starting dose (p = 0.195); however, the dose at which the first response occurred was higher in group (B) (p < 0.01). The total dose and number of days were higher in group (B) (both p < 0.01) irrespective of the PCOS subtype or androgen levels. Severe OHSS was also higher in group (B) (p = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: PCOS with AMH >4.6 ng/ml are resistant to HMG stimulation, require dose step up during ART cycles, and are at higher risk for severe OHSS.
METHODS: AMH was drawn before ovulation induction in 976 PCOS women scheduled for IVF/ICSI. After all cycles ended, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was done to investigate the ability of AMH to predict step up of the HMG.
RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.820 95%CI (0.792-0.848), and a cutoff value of 4.6 ng/ml (sensitivity 74%, specificity 82%) for AMH was taken (p < 0.01). Cases were divided into two groups retrospectively; group (A) (AMH ≤4.6 ng/ml), and group (B) (AMH >4.6 ng/ml). No difference in the mean age (p = 0.147); BMI (p = 0.411), basal FSH (p = 0.221), and starting dose (p = 0.195); however, the dose at which the first response occurred was higher in group (B) (p < 0.01). The total dose and number of days were higher in group (B) (both p < 0.01) irrespective of the PCOS subtype or androgen levels. Severe OHSS was also higher in group (B) (p = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: PCOS with AMH >4.6 ng/ml are resistant to HMG stimulation, require dose step up during ART cycles, and are at higher risk for severe OHSS.