Scientific reports · 2025
Effects of esketamine-based opioid-sparing anesthesia protocol in Bama miniature pigs undergoing robot-assisted nephrectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Meiyan, Li Weihua, Sun Jia, Zhang Yuhan, Zhou Fan, Ren Ying, Qi Yu, Wang Liwei
Аннотация
The safety and efficacy of the esketamine-based opioid-sparing anesthesia protocol, though validated, are understudied in robotic surgeries. This study used robot-assisted nephrectomy in Bama miniature pigs to explore its application. Six healthy Bama miniature pigs were randomly assigned to esketamine group (K) and control group (C). In Group K, based on the anesthetics of Group C, 0.5 mg/kg esketamine was used for anesthesia induction, and anesthesia was maintained with 0.5 mg/kg·h esketamine. Results showed Group K exhibited more stable hemodynamics intraoperatively, particularly at 5 min after the start of surgery and at the time of extubation (p < 0.05). Dosages of propofol (250 ± 8.7 mg vs. 347 ± 6.1 mg), sufentanil (12.3 ± 0.6 µg vs. 25 ± 1.0 µg) and remifentanil (498.3 ± 27.5 µg vs. 828.3 ± 20.2 µg) in group K were significantly reduced(p < 0.001). Recovery times for eyelid reflex (22.0 ± 2.0 min vs. 28.0 ± 2.6 min), extubation (24.7 ± 2.5 min vs. 32.3 ± 2.5 min), and righting reflex (37.7 ± 2.5 min vs. 48.7 ± 5.5 min) were significantly shorter in group K (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the esketamine-based opioid-sparing anesthesia protocol can be safely and effectively used in Bama miniature pigs undergoing robot-assisted nephrectomy.