Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
Nab-paclitaxel plus platinum versus paclitaxel plus platinum as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Yuan, Fang Shan-Shan, Zhao Run-Sheng, Liu Bo, Jin Yi-Qiang, Li Quan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus platinum versus paclitaxel plus platinum as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.
METHODS: Between October 2020 and March 2022, consecutive patients with diagnosed with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer were retrospectively recruited in our hospital. Fifty-four patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin. Twenty-four patients were treated with paclitaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was done using a multivariable logistic regression model. The two groups were compared for objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the raw and matched dataset.
RESULTS: The nab-paclitaxel group showed a higher ORR than the paclitaxel group both in the raw dataset (72.2% vs. 45.8%; P = 0.025) and matched dataset (81.1% vs. 47.6%; P = 0.008). The median PFS was significantly longer in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel group both in the raw and matched dataset (12 vs. 7 months; P < 0.05). The median OS was not reached in the nab-paclitaxel group compared with 15 months in the paclitaxel group, with a trend toward prolongation. The most common toxicity was hematological adverse events, including grade 3-4 neutropenia, grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia in both groups and no statistical differences were observed between the groups (all P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Compared with paclitaxel plus platinum, nab-paclitaxel plus platinum may be an effective and tolerable option as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.
METHODS: Between October 2020 and March 2022, consecutive patients with diagnosed with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer were retrospectively recruited in our hospital. Fifty-four patients were treated with nab-paclitaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin. Twenty-four patients were treated with paclitaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was done using a multivariable logistic regression model. The two groups were compared for objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the raw and matched dataset.
RESULTS: The nab-paclitaxel group showed a higher ORR than the paclitaxel group both in the raw dataset (72.2% vs. 45.8%; P = 0.025) and matched dataset (81.1% vs. 47.6%; P = 0.008). The median PFS was significantly longer in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the paclitaxel group both in the raw and matched dataset (12 vs. 7 months; P < 0.05). The median OS was not reached in the nab-paclitaxel group compared with 15 months in the paclitaxel group, with a trend toward prolongation. The most common toxicity was hematological adverse events, including grade 3-4 neutropenia, grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia in both groups and no statistical differences were observed between the groups (all P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Compared with paclitaxel plus platinum, nab-paclitaxel plus platinum may be an effective and tolerable option as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.