[Safety and feasibility of carotid artery stenting in patients with coexisting carotid and coronary artery disease].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the safety and feasibility of carotid artery stenting (CAS) for treating patients with coexisting carotid and coronary artery disease.
METHODS
The clinical data of 237 consecutive patients [(66.1 ± 7.7) years old, 79.7% male] with coexisting carotid and coronary artery disease undergoing CAS in Fuwai hospital from January 2005 to June 2010. The patients were analyzed retrospectively.Indication for CAS was defined as carotid artery diameter reduction of > 60% (symptomatic) or > 80% (asymptomatic) with suitable carotid artery anatomy for stenting. Thirty-day rates of stroke, death and myocardial infarction after CAS were assessed.
RESULTS
All patients suffered from coronary artery disease, of whom 87(36.7%) had unstable angina pectoris and 82(34.6%) had recent myocardial infarction (< 30 days). The procedural success rate of CAS was 99.2 % (235/237). Cerebral protection devices were used in 234 patients (99.6%). Among them, 36(15.2%) patients received simultaneous bilateral CAS and 79(33.3%) patients underwent simultaneous percutaneous intervention of other non-coronary arteries.Within 30 days after CAS, 127(53.6%) patients underwent coronary revascularization, including 118(49.6%) coronary artery bypass grafting and 9 (3.8%) percutaneous coronary intervention. The rate of major stroke, minor stroke, death and myocardial infarction from time of CAS to 30 days was 2.1% (5/237), 3.0% (7/237),0.4% (1/237) and 0.4% (1/237) respectively.
CONCLUSION
Data from this study indicate that CAS is safe and feasible for treating patients with coexisting carotid and coronary artery disease with a low incidence of periprocedural complication rate.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.