MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-9-36

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of surgical oncology · 2011

Cystic cavernous malformation of the cerebellopontine angle: case report and literature review.

Huang Haiyan, Xu Kan, Qu Limei, Li Ye, Yu Jinlu

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cavernous malformations (CMs) in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) are rare, and most of such CMs reported to date are solid and extend from the internal auditory canal into the CPA. In contrast, cystic CMs that arise in the CPA and do not involve the internal auditory canal and dura of the skull base are extremely rare.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old man presented with vertigo and progressive hearing loss in the right ear. MRI examination revealed a lesion in the CPA with solid and cystic components. Surgery was performed. Well-circumscribed adhesion to cranial nerves, the cerebellum, or the brain stem was noted during surgery. The lesion was totally resected. Pathological examination suggested the lesion to be a CM. At 1-year follow-up, the symptoms at presentation had resolved and no complications had occurred.

CONCLUSION

Although cystic CMs of the CPA have no established imaging features, a diagnosis of CMs may be suspected when a cystic lesion is present in the CPA and does not involve internal acoustic meatus or dura mater of the skull base. Skillful microsurgical techniques and monitoring of cranial nerves will secure good outcomes for patients with cystic CMs in the CPA.

Для цитирования: Huang Haiyan, Xu Kan, Qu Limei, Li Ye, Yu Jinlu. Cystic cavernous malformation of the cerebellopontine angle: case report and literature review.. World journal of surgical oncology. 2011. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-36.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.