DOI 10.1080/10826084.2023.2267108
The Role of Shame in the Relationship between Alcohol Use Severity and Relational Intimacy among Sexual Minority Women.
Аннотация
Background
Sexual Minority Women (SMW) are disproportionately likely to struggle with substance use and shame, two factors that are associated with poorer relationship quality and decreased relational intimacy (Doyle & Molix, 2015). However, there is a dearth of research examining shame and substance use concurrently among SMW.
Objectives
The current study elucidated the role of shame-based cognitions (SBCs) and shame-based behaviors (SBBs) in explaining the relationship between alcohol use severity and relational intimacy. We recruited adult cisgender women (N = 105) in a romantic relationship who self-identified as a sexual minority and reported alcohol use during the past three months through Amazon Mechanical Turk. Participants completed an online survey assessing alcohol use, SBCs, SBBs, and relational intimacy.
Results
There was a significant positive relationship between alcohol use severity with SBCs (r = .29, p = .003) and with SBBs (r = .62, p <.001). SBBs were shown to be negatively correlated with relational intimacy (r = -.48, p < .001). Parallel mediation analysis demonstrated that SBCs and SBBs accounted for approximately 34.4% of the variance in intimacy. The indirect effects of SBCs were significant (β = .10, 95% CI [.02, .18] while SBBs (β = -.14, 95% CI [-.29, .01]) did not show effects. Discussions: Given the disproportionate rates of alcohol use among SMW, this study offers a nuanced picture of the relationships between constructs known to impact alcohol use. The findings underscore the importance of SBCs and point to a potential treatment target among SMW presenting with alcohol use and diminished relational intimacy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.