MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10194-008-0016-z

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of headache and pain · 2008

Relationship between high prolactin levels and migraine attacks in patients with microprolactinoma.

Bosco D, Belfiore A, Fava A, De Rose M, Plastino M, Ceccotti C, Mungari P, Iannacchero R, Lavano A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The pathophysiology of pituitary-associated headache is unknown, although structural and functional features of the tumour are proposed mechanisms. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether headache in a population with pituitary micro-adenomas was related to hyperprolactinemia. We recruited 29 patients with microprolactinoma and headache: 16 with migraine (group A) and 13 with tension-type-headache (group B). The prolactin (PRL) levels measured during attacks of headache were significantly higher in nine patients (56%) of group A and in one patient (8%) of group B. In four of the nine patients of group A, PRL increased after thyrotropin-releasing-hormone (TRH) test and induced severe attacks. After dopamine-agonist (DA) treatment, the headache improved in seven (44%) patients of the group A and in two (15%) patients of the group B. Three of the four patients in whom the TRH-test induced headache attacks, improved after DA treatment. We suggest that hyperprolactinemia may contribute to development of pain in migraine subgroups and further TRH-test could be used to predict which patients could benefit by DA therapy.

Для цитирования: Bosco D, Belfiore A, Fava A, De Rose M, Plastino M, Ceccotti C, Mungari P, Iannacchero R, Lavano A. Relationship between high prolactin levels and migraine attacks in patients with microprolactinoma.. The journal of headache and pain. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s10194-008-0016-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.