MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01239.x

Медицинская библиотека · Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2007

Assessment of headache diagnosis. A comparative population study of a clinical interview with a diagnostic headache diary.

Phillip D, Lyngberg Ac, Jensen R

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The level of agreement between headache information, attained by clinical interview and headache diary, was evaluated in subjects who frequently suffered from headache and were participating in an epidemiological study of headache. One hundred and six subjects were interviewed and asked to complete a diary for a period of 4-8 weeks; 46% completed the study. For migraine the diary and clinical diagnoses demonstrated agreement in 82%, kappa value 0.57, sensitivity 90% and specificity 64%. For tension-type headache they demonstrated agreement in 87%, kappa value 0.39, sensitivity 97%, specificity 29% and a good agreement of frequency of tension-type headache was also obtained. In migraine, but not in tension-type headache, accompanying symptoms tended to be overestimated in the interview. The diary was not useful for the diagnosis of migraine with aura, but proved valuable in distinguishing between migraine and tension-type headache, and in the identification of coexisting headache disorders. Combined use of a diagnostic diary and clinical interview is recommended.

Для цитирования: Phillip D, Lyngberg Ac, Jensen R. Assessment of headache diagnosis. A comparative population study of a clinical interview with a diagnostic headache diary.. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache. 2007. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01239.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.