American journal of clinical pathology · 2020
Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma of the Central Nervous System Includes Parenchymal-Based Cases With Characteristic Features.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nomani Laila, Cotta Claudiu V, Hsi Eric D, Ferry Judith A, Cook James R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To define the clinicopathologic features of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) of the central nervous system (CNS), including cases arising in CNS parenchyma, which have been reported only rarely.
METHODS: Twelve cases of CNS EMZL were identified, including 5 based in CNS parenchyma and 7 nonparenchymal cases arising in dura or choroid plexus.
RESULTS: Histologically, parenchymal cases were perivascular infiltrates without a dominant lymphoid mass, whereas nonparenchymal cases were masses of small lymphocytes. Plasma cells were a larger component of the infiltrate in parenchymal cases (median, 30%; range, 20%-50%) than nonparenchymal cases (median, 0%; range, 0%-5%; P < .001), and plasma cells were clonal by immunohistochemistry in 4 of 5 parenchymal vs 1 of 7 nonparenchymal cases (P = .07). Fluorescence in situ hybridization for MALT1 rearrangement was positive in 1 of 3 parenchymal and none of 3 nonparenchymal cases. Chromosomal microarray was abnormal in 5 of 7 cases (71%), with chromosome 6/6q alterations identified in 3 cases. No patients with parenchymal disease but all 6 (100%) with nonparenchymal disease achieved complete remission.
CONCLUSIONS: This case series, the first to include multiple parenchymal cases, clarifies the spectrum of clinical, pathologic, and genetic findings in CNS EMZL and suggests that parenchymal-based lesions may show less favorable prognosis than dural-based disease.
METHODS: Twelve cases of CNS EMZL were identified, including 5 based in CNS parenchyma and 7 nonparenchymal cases arising in dura or choroid plexus.
RESULTS: Histologically, parenchymal cases were perivascular infiltrates without a dominant lymphoid mass, whereas nonparenchymal cases were masses of small lymphocytes. Plasma cells were a larger component of the infiltrate in parenchymal cases (median, 30%; range, 20%-50%) than nonparenchymal cases (median, 0%; range, 0%-5%; P < .001), and plasma cells were clonal by immunohistochemistry in 4 of 5 parenchymal vs 1 of 7 nonparenchymal cases (P = .07). Fluorescence in situ hybridization for MALT1 rearrangement was positive in 1 of 3 parenchymal and none of 3 nonparenchymal cases. Chromosomal microarray was abnormal in 5 of 7 cases (71%), with chromosome 6/6q alterations identified in 3 cases. No patients with parenchymal disease but all 6 (100%) with nonparenchymal disease achieved complete remission.
CONCLUSIONS: This case series, the first to include multiple parenchymal cases, clarifies the spectrum of clinical, pathologic, and genetic findings in CNS EMZL and suggests that parenchymal-based lesions may show less favorable prognosis than dural-based disease.