MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00127-015-1164-5

Медицинская библиотека · Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2015

Secondhand smoke exposure and mental health in adults: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies.

Zeng Yan-Ni, Li Ya-Min

СтатьяМетаанализПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Previous studies assessing secondhand smoke (SHS) and risk of mental health problems have yielded inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to statistically assess the association between SHS exposure, depressive symptoms and psychological distress among adults.

METHODS

A systematically search of Pubmed (1946-2015) and EMBASE (1976-2015) was conducted and supplemented by bibliographies of all retrieved articles to find additional relevant citations. Odds ratios (OR) and associated 95 % confidence interval (CI) of each eligible study were extracted and pooled in our meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies comprising 86,739 participants met the inclusion criteria. A random-effect model was used in meta-analysis since considerable heterogeneity was expected. Our results indicate that SHS exposure was significantly associated with depressive symptoms (OR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.35-1.90) and psychological distress (OR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.11-1.56).

CONCLUSION

Exposure to SHS among non-smoker is associated with depressive symptoms and psychological distress, emphasizing the significance of reducing SHS exposure at a population level.

Для цитирования: Zeng Yan-Ni, Li Ya-Min. Secondhand smoke exposure and mental health in adults: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies.. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-015-1164-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.