Artificial intelligence denoising in cardiac photon-counting CT: mitigating BMI-related noise degradation while maintaining clinical interchangeability.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether an artificial intelligence-based denoising (AID) algorithm can effectively attenuate body mass index (BMI)-related noise degradation in cardiac photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) while maintaining strict quantitative diagnostic equivalence and clinical interchangeability compared with quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 patients undergoing non-contrast coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring and contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography (CCTA) on a dual-source PCD-CT. Images were reconstructed using standard QIR and a PCD-CT-weighted AID algorithm. Subjective image quality was assessed by four blinded raters. Objective metrics included noise magnitude (noise power spectrum) and spatial resolution (edge rise distance). Frequentist generalized estimating equations (GEE) evaluated reconstruction effects and BMI interactions. Clinical interchangeability (Agatston scoring, coronary age, CAD-RADS, and plaque characterization) was assessed using Bayesian regions of practical equivalence (ROPE).

RESULTS: AID significantly improved subjective image quality and reduced overall noise magnitude by approximately 64 % in CAC and 78 % in CCTA (p<0.001). GEE models revealed that AID robustly attenuated BMI-driven noise escalation by 44 % (CAC) and 78 % (CCTA, p<0.001 for interactions in both). Noise texture was stable in CCTA datasets, but revealed smoothening in CAC datasets. However, spatial resolution was preserved and remained stable across varying patient habitus. ROPE analysis proved strict diagnostic equivalence between QIR and AID, yielding near-certain probabilities (>0.999) of practical equivalence for continuous Agatston scores, categorical CAD-RADS severity classification, and specific coronary plaque composition.

CONCLUSIONS: The PCD-CT-weighted AID algorithm improves subjective and objective image quality in both CAC and CCTA, while maintaining diagnostic equivalence and workflow efficiency compared to QIR.