World journal of radiology · 2026
Study of displayed radiation dose and size-specific dose estimate from computed tomography brain examinations in accordance to head sizes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chauhan Anushka, Sharma Sugandhi, Mishra Atul, Pathak Anurag, Mittal Kailash Kumar
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study is based on American Association of Physicist in Medicine (AAPM) task group (TG) report 204 to compare the displayed and calculated Radiation dose imparted to the patient in computed tomography (CT) head examination and the effective dose.
AIM: To identify whether there is a difference between displayed radiation doses and size-specific dose in CT head imaging. For ruling out the possibility of dose estimation difference.
METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was done on CT head examinations using multidetector CT. The study included subjects aged between 18 and 60 years with no obvious morphological head deformities. We compared the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) displayed and calculated where we used f factor for effective diameter from AAPM report 204 and manually calculated the SSDE for comparison. We also calculated the effective dose for head CT manually using dose-length product and k value from AAPM report 96.
RESULTS: The difference between SSDE Calculated and displayed was found to be -11.99%, the negative value depicts that the SSDE displayed in the patient dose chart in CT is much lower than the calculated SSDE. Hence it highly underestimates the dose received by the patient and further cancer risk estimation. We also found that the radiation dose received by patient is inversely related to the effective diameter of their head.
CONCLUSION: The observed difference between the calculated and displayed dose values falls within the acceptable range of 10%-20% as recommended by the AAPM TG report 204, indicating consistency with established guidelines.
AIM: To identify whether there is a difference between displayed radiation doses and size-specific dose in CT head imaging. For ruling out the possibility of dose estimation difference.
METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was done on CT head examinations using multidetector CT. The study included subjects aged between 18 and 60 years with no obvious morphological head deformities. We compared the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) displayed and calculated where we used f factor for effective diameter from AAPM report 204 and manually calculated the SSDE for comparison. We also calculated the effective dose for head CT manually using dose-length product and k value from AAPM report 96.
RESULTS: The difference between SSDE Calculated and displayed was found to be -11.99%, the negative value depicts that the SSDE displayed in the patient dose chart in CT is much lower than the calculated SSDE. Hence it highly underestimates the dose received by the patient and further cancer risk estimation. We also found that the radiation dose received by patient is inversely related to the effective diameter of their head.
CONCLUSION: The observed difference between the calculated and displayed dose values falls within the acceptable range of 10%-20% as recommended by the AAPM TG report 204, indicating consistency with established guidelines.