Expert review of endocrinology & metabolism · 2024
A retrospective study comparing the results of continuous glucose monitoring to self-blood glucose monitoring for pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khan Adeel Ahmad, Ata Fateen, Alsharkawy Naglaa Abdelaleem Al Sayed, Othman Eman Mahmoud Mohamed, Hassan Ifrah Mohamed, Taha Faten Altaher Mohd, Baagar Khaled, Ali Hamda, Konje Jutin C, Abou-Samra Abdul Badi, Bashir Mohammed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during pregnancy is associated with better glycemic control in women with T1DM. However, no clear benefits have been demonstrated in reducing adverse feto-maternal outcomes in pregnant women with T1DM.
DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study of pregnant women with T1DM to evaluate the impact of CGM use on glycemic control and feto-maternal outcomes in pregnant women with T1DM.
RESULTS: Of 265 women with T1DM, 92 (34.7%) used CGM, and 173 (65.3%) were managed with capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring. The mean (SD) age and BMI at the first visit were 29.4 (4.7) years and 27.2 (5.2) kg/m2, respectively. The mean (SD) HbA1c at the first-trimester visit was 63 (1) mmol/mol, and in the last trimester was 51 (1%). There was no difference in the mean changes in HbA1c between the two groups. Women using CGM had lower insulin requirements (1.02 + 0.37 vs. 0.87 + 0.04 units/kg, p = 0.01). The two groups had no significant differences in maternal or fetal outcomes.
CONCLUSION: CGM use in pregnant T1DM women is not associated with improved fetomaternal outcomes.
DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study of pregnant women with T1DM to evaluate the impact of CGM use on glycemic control and feto-maternal outcomes in pregnant women with T1DM.
RESULTS: Of 265 women with T1DM, 92 (34.7%) used CGM, and 173 (65.3%) were managed with capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring. The mean (SD) age and BMI at the first visit were 29.4 (4.7) years and 27.2 (5.2) kg/m2, respectively. The mean (SD) HbA1c at the first-trimester visit was 63 (1) mmol/mol, and in the last trimester was 51 (1%). There was no difference in the mean changes in HbA1c between the two groups. Women using CGM had lower insulin requirements (1.02 + 0.37 vs. 0.87 + 0.04 units/kg, p = 0.01). The two groups had no significant differences in maternal or fetal outcomes.
CONCLUSION: CGM use in pregnant T1DM women is not associated with improved fetomaternal outcomes.