MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.1.91

Медицинская библиотека · Yonsei medical journal · 2021

Wingspan Stenting for Symptomatic Severe In-Stent Stenosis of a Closed-Cell Stent after Stent-Assisted Coiling of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm.

Kim Jang Hoon, Chung Joonho

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We report the 3-year follow-up result of Wingspan intracranial stenting for symptomatic severe in-stent stenosis after stent-assisted coiling (SAC) for a ruptured left distal internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm. A middle-aged male patient visited our hospital for in-stent stenosis of a stent that was placed to treat a ruptured ICA aneurysm. Routine follow-up cerebral angiography, 1 year after SAC, showed in-stent stenosis around the distal markers of the inserted stent at the left M1 proximal segment. Six months later, he developed right dysesthesia. We performed intracranial stenting with Wingspan stent for the in-stent stenosis. Follow-up digital subtraction angiography performed 1 year after the Wingspan stenting showed good patency of the ICA and middle cerebral artery flow without evidence of restenosis. At 3-year follow-up, magnetic resonance angiography showed sufficient middle cerebral artery flow although the stenting segment could not be visualized clearly. Wingspan stenting might be a feasible option in patients with iatrogenic intracranial stenosis resulting from in-stent stenosis who experience the progression of intracranial stenosis with manifestation of neurological symptoms despite dual anti-platelet therapy.

Для цитирования: Kim Jang Hoon, Chung Joonho. Wingspan Stenting for Symptomatic Severe In-Stent Stenosis of a Closed-Cell Stent after Stent-Assisted Coiling of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm.. Yonsei medical journal. 2021. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.1.91.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.